%0 Journal Article
%T 文徵明《跋á黄庭经?》考论<br>Study on Wen Zhengming’s Annotations for Huangting Classic
%A 向彬
%J 中南大学学报（社会科学版）
%D 2017
%R 1672-3104(2017)01-0189-05
%X 摘 要： 文徵明先后两次题跋过不同版本的《黄庭经》拓本，其中一本为不全本，另一本为完本。文徵明题跋的这两本《黄庭经》都是根据唐人徐浩的摹本所刻拓，而《黄庭》不全本为明代都穆所藏。根据赵孟?\和董其昌的观点，米芾《书史》中所记载的黄素本《黄庭经》不是陶?b所说的王羲之换鹅物，应是晋代时期杨羲所书，但王羲之也的确书写过《黄庭经》。<br>Abstract: Wen Zhengming had done annotations for two versions of Huangting Classic rubbings before. One of them was not complete, but the other was. Both of them, postscripted by Wen Zhengming were the engraved copies of the extension according to Xu Hao in Tang Dynasty, and the incomplete version of Huangting Classic was preserved by Du Mu in Ming Dynasty. According to Zhao Mengfu and Dong Qichang, Huang Su’s Huangting Classic as recorded in Mi Fu's The History of Calligraphy was not Wang Xizhi’s yellow paper version as said by Tao Gu. It was, as a matter of fact, written by Yang Xi in Jin Dynasty, but Wang Xizhi had indeed once written Huangting Classic
%K Wen Zhengming
%K Huangting Classic
%K annotations
%U http://www.zndxsk.com.cn/Article_View_temp.asp?type=3433&ID=3433