%0 Journal Article
%T 重估五四反对派：从林纾的“反动文本”《荆生》《妖梦》谈起<br>Revaluation of the Opposition Factions in the May Fourth New Cultural Movement——A Case Study of Lin shu's
%A 王桂妹
%J 西南大学学报(社会科学版)
%D 2017
%R 10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2017.04.017
%X 重新认知“五四反对派”的正面价值是全面理解“五四”的题中应有之义。五四新文化运动中首次与新青年交锋的林纾，是被文学史固化乃至丑化的“反对派”，其小说《荆生》和《妖梦》更是新文学史上的经典“反动文本”。实际上，这两部小说乃是林纾的游戏笔墨，体现了林纾“好谐谑”的性格面相，也呈现出中国传统笔记小说“资谈助”的特征，并非现代意义上的严肃“小说”。这两部小说由小报上的“游戏文字”升级为新文化战场上的“反动文本”，成为五四新青年批判林纾的关键一击。重回历史现场，考察这一“反动文本”的历史生成过程，有益于深化对“五四”的全面认知。<br>Revaluation of the positive value of the opposition factions is a critical way of fully understanding the May Fourth Movement. Lin shu confronted the new youth in the May Fourth New Culture Movement for the first time. He was regarded and vilified as 'the opposition' in literary history, and his novels Jingsheng and Yaomeng became classic 'reactionary texts' in the history of new literature. Actually, these two novels were peppered with playful words, which reflect Lin Shu's playful and humorous character and the characteristics of traditional literary sketches. Therefore, it is not serious literature in the modern sense. These two novels evolved from 'game writing' to 'reactionary text' and were used as a deadly blow in the criticism of Lin Shu in the New Culture Movement. It is necessary to recreate the historical scene and investigate the truth and find out the historical generation process of these 'reactionary texts' to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the May Fourth movement
%K 五四
%K 林纾
%K 《荆生》
%K 《妖梦》&lt
%K br&gt
%U http://xbgjxt.swu.edu.cn/jsusse/html/2017/4/201704017.htm