%0 Journal Article
%T Comparisons of Growth and Survival Performance Among Selected Families and Wild Populations of Fenneropenaeus chinensis Comparisons of Growth and Survival Performance Among Selected Families and Wild Populations of Fenneropenaeus chinensis
%A LUO Kun
%A KONG Jie
%A MENG Xianhong
%A LUAN Sheng
%A CAO Baoxiang
%A CHEN Baolong
%J 中国海洋大学学报（英文版）
%D 2018
%X In this study,families of selected population for growth(SP_BWT),selected population for white spot syndrome virus(WSSV)resistance(SP_RW),Bohai wild population(WP_BH)and Huanghai wild population(WP_HH)of F.chinensis were constructed through artificial insemination and with the standardized procedure of larvae rearing.Growth and survival performance were studied among four populations after a 70 days common test.The results showed that the maximum least square mean of body weight was 17.50 g in SP_BWT while the minimum was 13.03 g in WP_HH.Compared with WP_BH,body weight of SP_BWT increased by 23.41%(P<0.01)and that of SP_RW by 12.20%(P>0.05).Body weights of SP_BWT and SP_RW were significantly higher than that of WP_HH,which increased by 34.31%(P<0.01)and 22.10%(P<0.05),respectively.The mean AGR of four populations was 0.19,0.18,0.17 and 0.16 g d~(-1),respectively.Coefficient of variation of body weight among four populations was high,which ranged from 32.67% to 35.25%.Such a range showed that there was the potentiality for further improvement in selected populations.Coefficient of variation of survival rate among four populations was low,varying between 3.20% and 5.90%.The difference of survival was highly significant(P<0.01)between SP_BWT and WP_BH,and significant(P<0.05)between SP_RW and WP_BH.However,no significant difference among other populations(P>0.05)was observed.Different growth performances were also observed among different families in each population.The body weight of 798F family was the highest.The absolute growth rate(AGR)was 0.25 g d~(-1),150%higher than that of the lowest one,0.1 g d~(-1) in 807F family.Survival rate of families among four populations was different.The highest was 94.74%,and the lowest was 71.88%
%U http://qdhb.cbpt.cnki.net/WKD/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=8366ae17-171a-4573-9b66-708460175de5