%0 Journal Article
%T 中医科学性争论欠规范化问题探究<br>On the non-standardization in the debate about the scientific property of TCM
%A 周 曦
%A 李树财
%J 医学争鸣
%D 2017
%X 为科学有效地探讨中医科学性问题，据争论过程中表现出的政治化、全民化、泛文化、情绪化等“随 意”性问题，提出争论应遵循同行争鸣原则、普遍主义原则、祛私利性原则、有创见的怀疑原则等规范，促进科 学规范意识的形成，营造良好的学术环境。<br>This article aims at scientific and effective debate about the scientific property of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Lots of debates are rather “arbitrary”, characterized by politicization, universalization, pan-culturalization and moodiness. So we raise the principles which the argument should follow, such as peer debate, universalism, disinterestedness and aggressive suspicion, in the hope of promoting the consciousness of the norms of science and creating a good academic environment
%K 中医
%K 科学争论
%K 科学规范
%K 科学精神<br>TCM
%K scientific debate
%K norms of science
%K scientific spirit
%U http://yxzm.paperonce.org/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201703017