%0 Journal Article
%T 政治现代性视域中马克思与黑格尔关系再思考
%A 汪行福
%J 复旦学报(社会科学版)
%D 2017
%X 政治现代性视域中马克思与黑格尔的思想关系是一个复杂而又有现实性的问题。当今学界有两种观点,一种观点认为他们的政治思想是完全对立的,另一种观点认为他们从哲学到理治理念是完全一致的。实际上,马克思与黑格尔在现代性理念上具有一致性,他们都认为现代性社会必须以实现的人的全面发展为目的,都承认个人的自由依赖于合理的政治共同体,都认为资本主义社会是充满矛盾和片面性的,但是,他们对现代性矛盾的性质的理解和解决它们的政治方案有着完全不同的设想。黑格尔相信现代社会可以依靠理智国家调节市民社会的私人矛盾,依靠伦理国家调节政治共同体和不同权力部门之间的矛盾,因此,我们应该立足于现实对它进行完善。而在马克思这里,自由资本主义无论是作为经济制度,还是作为政治共同体形式,相对于现代性理想来说都已经破产,不具有实现个人和集体自由的理性潜能。因此,人类的历史任务是通过革命加速它的灭亡,早日实现共产主义。</br>Abstract：The relation of Marx and Hegel in the political vision is a complicated and practical problem. Currently there are two points of view in the academia: one holds that their political thoughts were opposite to each other; and the other holds that they were completely unanimous in philosophical and rational political theories. In fact, Marx and Hegel were consistent in modern theories. Both of them believed that a modern society must achieve the goal of people's comprehensive development, and they all admitted that the individual's freedom depending on a reasonable political community, and that the capitalist society was contradictory and one-sided. However, they had complete different ideas approaching the nature of modern contradiction and corresponding political solutions. Hegel believed that in a modern society the private civil contradictions can be regulated by rational state. And the contradiction between political community and power executives can be regulated by an ethical state. Thus we should improve it based on the reality. For Marx, free capitalism, whether as an economic system or as a political community, is bankrupt for modern ideals and has no potential to achieve individual and collective freedom.
%K 黑格尔
%K 马克思
%K 现代性
%K 伦理国家
%K 共产主义&lt
%K /br&gt
%K Hegel
%K Marx
%K modernism
%K ethical state
%K communism
%U http://www.fdwkxb.fudan.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2172.shtml