%0 Journal Article
%T 论清人对古文传记“小说气”之批评
%A 王庆华
%J 复旦学报(社会科学版)
%D 2018
%X 清人从“辨体”出发,针对明代以来古文创作中的诸多弊病,强调凸显古文地位、维护古文规范和纯洁性,区分古文与“小说”之文体界限,形成了理论批评的独特个案现象。批评古文传记之“小说气”主要集中于有违古文“雅洁”风格规范而沾染了“小说”俗鄙之气,有违古文叙事尚简原则而运用了“小说”之“笔法”,有违古文语言典雅标准而掺入“小说”词句等。清人将“小说气”的古文传记定位于集部之传文和子部之“小说”之间。“正史”列传、史部“传记”、集部“传体文”属于相联相通的文类、文体谱系,《史记》等史传文之“文笔”实际上可看作古文传记“小说气”之渊源,清代“小说气”的古文传记也是承继唐宋以来的古文传统而来的。</br>Abstract：The Qing scholars who emphasized the position, criterion and purity of guwen (classical prose), proposed to distinguish the literary styles of guwen and xiaoshuo (fictional writing), which formed special phenomenon of literary criticism. The criticism mainly focused on the violation of the elegant and simple style of the classical prose in the writing of xiaoshuo. They classified the fictional style biographical work into a special genre between biography (in ji section) and xiaoshuo (in zi section). However, it should be noted that the fictional style has its origin in literary pedigree which could be traced back to Shiji in the Han Dynasty and the guwen tradition in the Tang and Song as well.
%K 清代
%K 古文传记
%K 小说习气
%K 批评&lt
%K /br&gt
%K Qing Dynasty
%K biography in classical prose
%K fictional style
%K criticism
%U http://www.fdwkxb.fudan.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2301.shtml