%0 Journal Article
%T 一般人格权形成路径的宪法学分析
%A 刘志刚
%J 复旦学报(社会科学版)
%D 2017
%X 瑞士和德国确立一般人格权的方式代表了一般人格权形成的两种典型路径。德国的一般人格权是联邦最高法院直接依据基本法、通过司法判例的形式形成的。德国保护一般人格权的模式是“具体人格权+一般人格权”。我国“一般人格权”的形成路径存在一些问题,需要进一步完善。人格权本质上是一种宪法权利和自然权利,人格权应该通过法定主义的方式加以设立,但不适合在民法典中将人格权独立成编。人格要素分解之后在民法中确立的具体人格权的性质是民事权利,但一般人格权的宪法权利性质不会因为规定于民法而发生实质性的改变。仿效德国采行“具体人格权+一般人格权”的模式存在许多弊端,应当借鉴瑞士的做法,采取“具体人格权+保护人格权一般条款”的模式,该种模式具有宪法层面的价值。</br>Abstract：The general personality system in Switzerland and Germany represents respectively the two typical formation paths of general personality right. It is directly formed on the basis of the basic law and the judicial precedent in the Supreme Court of Germany. The protection mode in Germany is “specific personality right and general personality right.” Chinese general personality right’s formation path requires further improvement. The right of personality is a constitutional and natural right, although it should be established in a legal way, it is not suitable for being compiled independently in civil code. After the decomposition of personality factors, the specific personality right in civil law is civil right, but the nature of constitutional right of general personality right should not be changed. The mode of “specific personality right and general provisions for the protection of personality right,” following the Swiss mode, should be established in China. This kind of mode has the comparative advantage of private law, and it also has constitutional value.
%K 一般人格权
%K 形成路径
%K 宪法学分析&lt
%K /br&gt
%K general personality right in civil law
%K formation path
%K constitutional analysis
%U http://www.fdwkxb.fudan.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2261.shtml