%0 Journal Article
%T 理论、边界与碎片化检讨——新文化史研究的再思考
%A 张仲民
%J 复旦学报(社会科学版)
%D 2016
%X 近些年,中国大陆也兴起新文化史译介热,但仍存在一些容易引起误会和争议的问题。本文对此进行了回顾反思,指出新文化史本身汲取了很多理论成果,这可以让史家更加谨慎地对待自己的工作,更加谨慎地展示自己的发现,更加谨慎地对待各种分析框架和研究典范。而在当下的西方,新文化史已经有统摄整个历史研究领域之势,它也同更多的相邻学科发生了密切关系,一个新文化史研究的国际化潮流已经出现,但由此也产生了“文化”的定义到底为何及其同社会的关系怎样、新文化史研究的碎片化等问题。</br>Abstract：In recent years, new cultural history has been intensely introduced in China mainland while some problems remain to be clarified. This article points out that new cultural history itself has already drawn on certain theories, which enables historians to treat their research deliberately and be critical about various analytical frameworks and paradigms. In current Western academia, while new cultural history has seemingly occupied a dominant position in the field of history and become closely associated with adjacent subjects, some problems arise along with the international trend of new cultural history. This paper argues that “culture” may not be able to exert influence beyond material, economic and societal context, which requires historians to reach a deep understanding of economic and societal elements and absorb theories of related fields so to adopt more-refined historical narratives, avoiding going on a path of generalization of culture and fragmentation of history research. The so-called fragmentation problem in Chinese context is actually a problem of repetitive work at a low level, instead of a fragmentation problem in the context of new cultural history. Admittedly, some empirical works have emerged: it is solely an imitation of Western works instead of a natural development following its inner logic, which leads to lots of misunderstandings and puzzles.
%U http://www.fdwkxb.fudan.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1617.shtml