%0 Journal Article
%T Schwartz价值观理论的发展历程与最新进展
%A 李玲
%A 金盛华
%J 心理科学
%D 2016
%X 摘要： 本文对Schwartz价值观理论的诞生、定型、重构过程进行了全过程的追踪式探究，梳理了该理论的完整发展脉络，详细介绍了被广泛引用的Schwartz价值观测量工具的开发与发展过程、使用方法及数据处理的核心环节,第一次完整呈现了Schwartz重构之后的价值观理论，对国内原有介绍Schwartz价值观理论中重要概念的不准确翻译做了必要修正。此外，本文还发掘了Schwartz建构价值观理论的方法，并说明了该如何恰当运用该理论。</br>Abstract: Schwartz’s theory of basic human values is undoubtedly the most influential theory in value research area. In 2015, according to the citation rates, the main research reports of the theory were rewarded by Web of Science as “the top 1%” articles in psychological fields. The central assumption of the theory is that values exist as a circular motivational continuum. In past 25 years’ refining and reconstruction, the theory had changed from the original seven basic personal values(1987), to the expanded ten(1992),and finally the refined nineteen basic human values(2012).The newest reconstruction of the theory divides the motivational continuum of values into a series of well defined, conceptually distinct values, namely self-direction-thought, self-direction-action, stimulation, hedonism, achievement, power- dominance, power-resources, face, security-personal, security-societal, tradition, conformity-rules, conformity-interpersonal, humility, benevolence-caring, benevolence-dependability, universalism-concern, universalism- nature, and universalism-tolerance. Above those first-tier values, there exists a second-tier value dimension, namely openness to change verses conservation, self-enhancement verses self- transcendence, social focus verses personal focus, and growth verses self-protection. The present paper aims to clearly overview the developmental vein of Schwartz’s theory. Firstly, it clarified the different construction stages of Schwartz’s circular structure of values and meanwhile provided detailed information on the main thoughts and methods he devised for theory formulation and modification. Second, due to the previously imprecise translation and subsequent messy usage among domestic value research, we systematically examined and modified the extant translations of core definitions and markers of each value in Schwarz’s value theory. In addition, we minutely depicted both compatible and incompatible motivations underlying each value, and offered dimensions that could be devised to group values contingent on the specific research question. Third, the paper also introduced and discussed the characteristics of and differentiations between the two major instruments, the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) and the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ), which had been extensively used in value research fields. Of great
%K Schwartz value theory value structure circular motivational continuum
%U http://www.psysci.org/CN/abstract/abstract9626.shtml