%0 Journal Article
%T 正念是什么——从正念内涵研究发展角度的思考
%A 郭璞洋
%A 李波
%J 心理科学
%D 2017
%X 摘要： “正念是什么”是正念研究中的基本问题，也是长期困扰研究者的难题，造成此困境的重要原因是正念跨越了佛学与心理学两种语境。在正念内涵研究历程中，研究者们先后试图以“去神秘化”、“去语境化”及“整合化”来解决跨语境所造成的问题。本研究认为：正念为多维概念，其内涵的复杂性决定了研究者对正念的认识并非凝固的判断，而是逐步成熟的过程；应深入整合佛学与心理学语境，以发展的视角看待正念。</br>Abstract: As the essential question in mindfulness research, “What is mindfulness” is a conundrum that has plagued researchers for decades. In much degree, the dilemma is created by the trans-contextual characteristic of mindfulness, since mindfulness is a concept spanning between Buddhism and psychology. Mindfulness meditation, originated from “satipatthana” in Buddhism, is the essence of Buddhist practice, the core of mindfulness-based intervention, and also a state that could be experienced in daily life by anyone. Researchers’ attempts in understanding the concept construction of mindfulness are manifested in “demystifying”, “de-contextualizing”, and “integrating” processes successively. Since Kabat-Zinn introduced mindfulness into psychological field from Buddhist context using “American language” in 1979, mindfulness has won more and more attention from scholars owing to its remarkable efficacy and extensive applicability. Without remoulding the connotation of mindfulness, Kabat-Zinn skillfully integrated the elements of Buddhism into commonsensical language, converting mindfulness into universal psychological interventions from religious meditation. This is referred to as “demystifying stage”, in which researchers focused on work of “what is mindfulness in commonsensical way”. Even though Kabat-Zinn clarified repeatedly that what he had done was not ‘de-contextualization’, the mainstream of mindfulness research gradually transmuted to that trend in the process of psychologicalization. Researchers attempted to abstract mindfulness from the Buddhist context that it originated from, and discarded the possible influence caused by its religious significance. According to the degree of recognition of theoretical research, the stage of“de-contextualization” could be further divided into “positivism approach” and “psychometrics and theoretical modeling approach”. Researchers of positivism approach mainly concentrated on the efficacy of mindfulness in the stage of de-contextualization, and inspected the effect of mindfulness-base intervention for different groups or different diseases, and took symptomatic scale, behaviors or physiological indices as indicators. In this stage, the interpretation of mindfulness embodied as the tendency of simplification and utility. The exploration during this period could be summarized as “simply speaking what is
%K mindfulness Buddhism context integration multi-dimension
%U http://www.psysci.org/CN/abstract/abstract9925.shtml