%0 Journal Article
%T A Comparison of Energy Consumption in Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Pyrolysis of Microalgae
%A Changyan Yang
%A Jinsheng Wu
%A Zhao Deng
%A Bo Zhang
%A Chang Cui
%A Yigang Ding
%J Trends in Renewable Energy
%P 76-85
%@ 2376-2144
%D 2017
%R 10.17737/tre.2017.3.1.0013
%X The energy requirements for converting one tonne (1,000 kg) of Chlorella slurry of 20 wt% solids via fast pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP), and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) were compared. Drying microalgae prior to pyrolysis by using a spray drying process with a 50% energy efficiency required an energy input of 4,107 MJ. The energy inputs to conduct fast pyrolysis, MAP, and HTL reactions were 504 MJ (50% efficient), 1,057 MJ (~25% efficient), and 2,776 MJ (50% efficient), respectively. Therefore, the energy requirement of fast pyrolysis is theoretically about 1.6 times more than that of HTL. The microalgal feed contained 4,000 MJ, and the energy recovery ratios for fast pyrolysis, MAP, and HTL of microalgae were 78.7%, 57.2%, and 89.8%, respectively. From the energy balance point of view, hydrothermal liquefaction is superior, and it achieved a higher energy recovery with a less energy cost. To improve the pyrolysis process, developing drying devices powered by renewable energies, optimizing the pyrolysis process (specifically microwave-assisted), and improving the energy efficiency of equipment are options.
%K Microalgae
%K Energy Consumption
%K Pyrolysis
%K Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL)
%K Microwave-assisted pyrolysis
%K Thermal Drying
%U http://futureenergysp.com/index.php/tre/article/view/13