%0 Journal Article
%T The Dragon and the Tiger: Realties in the Control of Tuberculosis
%A P. Bhatter
%A A. Chatterjee
%A N. Mistry
%J Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
%D 2012
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2012/625459
%X India and China are two Asian super-powers with developing economies carried on the shoulders of their booming populations. This growth can only be sustained by nurturing their ¡°human resource¡±. However increasing reports of insufficient public health (PH) initiatives in India when compared to the aggressive PH system of China may prove to be the Achilles¡¯ heels for India. This review compares the PH system in India and China for combating Tuberculosis (TB), the disease responsible for maximum mortality and morbidity by a single infectious agent. While China has acknowledged the disease load and thereafter has methodically improved its reporting, detection, diagnosis and treatment, India is still in denial of the imminent health risk. The Indian PH system still considers TB as a ¡°facultative¡± disease for which the required control measures are already in place and functioning. Globally, India and China recorded the highest Multi-Drug Resistant TB (MDR) cases notified in 2010 (64000 and 63000, respectively). Additionally non-government sources reported extremely high proportions of MDR in India. Here we have compared the medical, social and economic approaches of the two nations towards better management and control of TB. Does India have lessons to learn from China? 1. Introduction The Tiger and the Dragon have been pitted against each other for a while now, as both countries have asserted their right-full place on the world stage, economically and otherwise. India¡¯s economic growth, hovering around 8-9% per year, has fuelled speculation on whether and when India may catch or surpass China¡¯s over 10% growth rate [1]. While India made its presence felt by a booming ¡°skilled-labour-middle-class¡± bringing the technology revolution to its door steps, China has muscled its way through an ¡°organized-labour-lower-middle-class¡± propelling industry and production. The immediate byproduct of the two different growth stories is the neglected rural population and ¡°the taken for granted¡± urban population. The focus on the rural population to usher economic reforms (which was the turning point in China¡¯s economic development) has constantly attempted to achieve social objectives such as education and health care which have brought to China a holistic development. On the contrary, the ¡°shining India¡± story has resulted in greater disparity between the rural and the urban [1]. The differences between India and China are, however, beyond the omnipresent economic growth. The strategic reforms (political and social) in China have placed it in a better position as compared
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ipid/2012/625459/