%0 Journal Article
%T Short Term Recovery of Function following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Study of the Medial Parapatellar and Midvastus Approaches
%A Richard W. Nutton
%A Frazer A. Wade
%A Fiona J. Coutts
%A Marietta L. van der Linden
%J Arthritis
%D 2014
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2014/173857
%X This pilot double blind randomised controlled study aimed to investigate whether the midvastus (MV) approach without patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) resulted in improved recovery of function compared to the medial parapatellar (MP) approach. Patients were randomly allocated to either the MV approach or the MP approach. Achievements of inpatient mobility milestones were recorded. Knee kinematics, muscle strength, Timed Up and Go, WOMAC, and daily step count were assessed before and up to six months after surgery. Cohen¡¯s effect size was calculated to inform the sample size in future trials. Twenty-eight participants (16 males, 12 females) participated. Patient mobility milestones such as straight leg raise were achieved on average 1.3 days (95% CI £¿3.4 to 0.7, ) earlier in the MV group. Knee extensor strength at 6 weeks after surgery was higher (95% CI £¿0.38 to 0.61, ) in the MV group. No trends for differences between the groups were observed in knee kinematics, TUG, WOMAC, or step count. Our results suggest a short term advantage in the first 6 weeks after surgery of the MV approach over the MP approach, but a larger study is required to confirm these findings. This trial is registered with NCT056445. 1. Introduction Total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis has been shown to be successful in relieving pain and improve function and quality of life for the majority of patients. However, continued efforts are directed to further optimise the functional outcome of total knee surgery by attempting to improve implant design [1, 2] and more recently the type of surgical approach used. The term ¡°minimally invasive surgery¡± covers a variety of approaches including midvastus and mini-parapatellar approaches with or without computer navigation. Several authors have compared the effects on outcome of the midvastus (MV) approach compared to the more traditional medial parapatellar (MP) approach and their results have been summarised by reviews [3¨C5] concluding some early benefits on mobility milestone and muscle strength. However, only few studies [6¨C9] included in the above reviews and more recent studies [10, 11] were prospective randomised controlled trials and only few reported a double blind design. A recent study comparing the midvastus approach with the medial parapatellar approach in bilateral TKA, by Nestor et al. [10], was the only one to standardise incision length allowing both the patient and the assessor to be blind to group allocation. Jarvis et al. [12] compared the knee kinematics and kinetics during sit-to-stand
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/arthritis/2014/173857/