%0 Journal Article
%T Inspiratory Capacity during Exercise: Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation
%A Jordan A. Guenette
%A Roberto C. Chin
%A Julia M. Cory
%A Katherine A. Webb
%A Denis E. O'Donnell
%J Pulmonary Medicine
%D 2013
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2013/956081
%X Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an established method for evaluating dyspnea and ventilatory abnormalities. Ventilatory reserve is typically assessed as the ratio of peak exercise ventilation to maximal voluntary ventilation. Unfortunately, this crude assessment provides limited data on the factors that limit the normal ventilatory response to exercise. Additional measurements can provide a more comprehensive evaluation of respiratory mechanical constraints during CPET (e.g., expiratory flow limitation and operating lung volumes). These measurements are directly dependent on an accurate assessment of inspiratory capacity (IC) throughout rest and exercise. Despite the valuable insight that the IC provides, there are no established recommendations on how to perform the maneuver during exercise and how to analyze and interpret the data. Accordingly, the purpose of this manuscript is to comprehensively examine a number of methodological issues related to the measurement, analysis, and interpretation of the IC. We will also briefly discuss IC responses to exercise in health and disease and will consider how various therapeutic interventions influence the IC, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Our main conclusion is that IC measurements are both reproducible and responsive to therapy and provide important information on the mechanisms of dyspnea and exercise limitation during CPET. 1. Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is increasingly recognized as an important clinical diagnostic tool for assessing exercise intolerance and exertional symptoms, and for objectively determining functional capacity and impairment [1]. CPET is particularly well suited for understanding factors that may limit or oppose (i.e., constrain) ventilation in the face of increasing ventilatory requirements during exercise both in research and clinical settings. Traditionally, ventilatory reserve has been evaluated by examining the relationship between peak exercise ventilation ( ) and the measured (or estimated) maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV). Thus, an increased ratio (e.g., /MVV > 85%) occurring at a relatively low work rate, in the setting of an adequate cardiovascular reserve, strongly suggests that ventilatory factors are contributing to exercise limitation [1]. However, MVV may not accurately reflect sustainable peak in some individuals since respiratory muscle recruitment patterns, operating lung volumes, breathing pattern, and respiratory sensation are distinctly different during brief bursts of voluntary hyperpnea
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/pm/2013/956081/