%0 Journal Article
%T Is the Truth in Your Words? Distinguishing ChildrenĄ¯s Deceptive and Truthful Statements
%A Shanna Mary Williams
%A Victoria Talwar
%A R. C. L. Lindsay
%A Nicholas Bala
%A Kang Lee
%J Journal of Criminology
%D 2014
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2014/547519
%X ChildrenĄ¯s (N = 48) and adultsĄ¯ (N = 28) truthful and deceptive statements were compared using a linguistics-based computer software program. Children (4 to 7 years of age) and adults (18 to 25 years of age) participated in a mock courtroom experiment, in which they were asked to recount either a true or fabricated event. Testimonies were then analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Software (LIWC; Pennebaker et al. 2007). This software has been previously used to detect adultsĄ¯ deceptive statements (e.g., Bond and Lee, 2005). To date, no research has used this method on childrenĄ¯s narratives, nor has this software been used to compare those narratives to adult counterparts. Markers generated through the LIWC program achieved detection rates of 72.40% for samples of both childrenĄ¯s and adultsĄ¯ narratives combined. In contrast, adult laypersonsĄ¯ (N = 48) detection rates, for the same narratives (i.e., both children and adults) were close to chance. More specifically, detection rates were above chance for truth (65.00%) and below chance for lies (45.00%). Thus, the linguistic profile provided through LIWC yielded greater accuracy for evaluating the veracity of childrenĄ¯s and adultsĄ¯ narratives compared to adult laypersonsĄ¯ detection accuracy. 1. Introduction In the last three decades, greater numbers of children have testified in court [1, 2], which has led to an increased interest in research on the reliability and credibility of child witnesses [3, 4]. To date child witness researchers have focused on childrenĄ¯s testimonial capacities, reliability, and suggestibility, as well as jurorsĄ¯ perceptions and biases (e.g., [5¨C9]). Children are capable of giving highly accurate accounts and can make competent witnesses (e.g., [10, 11]). However, relatively few studies have focused on methods of assessing the truthfulness of child witness testimonies [12]. ChildrenĄ¯s honesty is a debated issue in the justice system, as some have raised concerns that children may be easily coached in giving fabricated reports of abuse or in falsely recanting true allegations of abuse [13¨C16]. As children can be coached to tell false stories (e.g., [2, 17, 18]), research is needed to examine reliable methods for adults to accurately distinguish between childrenĄ¯s truthful and deceptive statements. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness of a computer-based software program, Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC), in distinguishing childrenĄ¯s fabricated and truthful narratives. In addition, the computer-based analysis of child testimony was compared
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jcrim/2014/547519/