%0 Journal Article
%T Farmers' Interest in Nature and Its Relation to Biodiversity in Arable Fields
%A J. Ahnstr£¿m
%A J. Bengtsson
%A £¿. Berg
%A L. Hallgren
%A W. J. Boonstra
%A J. Bj£¿rklund
%J International Journal of Ecology
%D 2013
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2013/617352
%X Biodiversity declines in farmland have been attributed to intensification of farming at the field level and loss of heterogeneity at the landscape level. However, farmers are not solely optimizing production; their actions are also influenced by social factors, tradition and interest in nature, which indirectly influence biodiversity but rarely are incorporated in studies of farmland biodiversity. We used social science methods to quantify farmers' interest in nature on 16 farms with winter wheat fields in central Sweden, and combined this with biodiversity inventories of five organism groups (weeds, carabid beetles, bumblebees, solitary bees, and birds) and estimates of landscape composition and management intensity at the field level. Agricultural intensity, measured as crop density, and farmers' interest in nature explained variation in biodiversity, measured as the proportion of the regional species richness found on single fields. Interest in nature seemed to incorporate many actions taken by farmers and appeared to be influenced by both physical factors, for example, the surrounding landscape, and social factors, for example, social motivations. This study indicates that conservation of biodiversity in farmland, and design of new agri-environmental subsidy systems, would profit from taking farmers' interest in nature and its relation to agricultural practices into account. 1. Introduction It is widely recognized that biodiversity in European farmland is declining [1¨C6]. This has been attributed to agricultural intensification at farm and landscape scales and loss of both crop and noncrop heterogeneity [5, 7¨C11]. To counteract these negative effects and to give farmers incentives to adopt environmental and nature friendly practices, agri-environmental schemes (AESs) have been established within EU. However, the effect of AES on biodiversity has in many cases been restricted [12¨C14]. It is also argued that AES fails to change farmers¡¯ attitudes to nature and the environment [15, 16]. There are many studies focusing on either farmland biodiversity or farmer attitudes (which will ultimately affect biodiversity), but the combination of the two remains rare (notable exceptions are, e.g., [17¨C20]). Studies of local ecological knowledge and traditional ecological knowledge highlight the role of farmers, that is, how farming practices are related to the ecosystem dynamics, how they interpret and respond to changes in ecosystems, and the resources that ecosystems provide [21, 22]. The decision making process of farmers regarding farm management is complex
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijecol/2013/617352/