%0 Journal Article
%T Susceptibility of Wheat Varieties to Soil-Borne <i>Rhizoctonia</i> Infection
%A Gyula Oros
%A Zolt¨˘n Na¨˘r
%A Don¨˘t Magyar
%J American Journal of Plant Sciences
%P 2240-2258
%@ 2158-2750
%D 2013
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ajps.2013.411277
%X <p class=\"MsoNormal\">
	<span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Response of 19
wheat varieties cultivated in </span><st1:country-region w:st=\"on\"><st1:place w:st=\"on\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Hungary</span></st1:place></st1:country-region><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> varied within large limits to soil borne </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Rhizoctonia</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> infection. The most frequent symptom, usually leading to d</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">a</span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">mping off was the root
neck </span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">necrosis. Four significant factors influencing the susceptibility of wheat
comprised 71% of total variation but none of them was dominant. The inhibition
of devel</span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">opment of survivors in </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Rhizoctonia</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> infested soil correlated with overall susceptibility of
variety concerned. The varie</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">ties Emese, Kikelet and Palot¨˘s </span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">are </span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">proved to be
less susceptible, but none of </span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">the </span><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">varieties could be certified as tolerant.</span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> </span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">No
relationships were revealed between pathogenicity of 26 </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Rhizoctonia</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> strains studied and their taxonomic position or origin.
The anamorph strains</span></span><span lang=\"EN-US\"> </span><span lang=\"EN-US\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">of </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Athelia</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">, </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Ceratobasidium</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">, </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Ceratorhiza</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> and </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Waitea</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> similar to </span><i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Thanatephorus</span></i><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">
%K Wheat
%K &lt
%K i&gt
%K Rhizoctonia&lt
%K /i&gt
%K Tolerance
%K Brown Patch
%K Soil-Borne
%K Virulence
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=39653