%0 Journal Article
%T Urachal Anomalies in Children: Experience at One Institution
%A Chen-Sheng Huang
%A Chih-Cheng Luo
%A Hsun-Chin Chao
%A Hung-Ming Chen
%J Chang Gung Medical Journal
%D 2003
%I 
%X Background: The embryological and anatomical features of urachal anomalies have beenwell defined. Because of the variable clinical presentations, uniform guidelinesfor evaluation and treatment are lacking. In an attempt to establish anoptimal diagnostic and treatment modality, we report our experience withurachal anomalies at a single institution over a 10-year period.Methods: The records of 20 patients with urachal abnormalities were reviewed. Theseincluded 12 males and 8 females with ages from 1 day to 12 years (average,3 years). The evaluation included symptoms and signs, and results of fistulography,sonography, and voiding cystography. Postoperative conditionswere also reviewed.Results: The presenting complaint was umbilical discharge in 14 patients, umbilicaldischarge with marked umbilical granulation tissue in 2, periumbilical erythemain 3, and abdominal pain in 1. Diagnostic evaluation included fistulographyin 5 cases, sonography in 13, and voiding cystourethrography in 3. The3 variants of urachal anomalies included a patent urachus in 4 patients(20%), urachal sinus in 13 (65%), and an infected urachal cyst in 3 (15%).Treatment consisted of primary excision with a cuff of the bladder in 3, excisionwith ligation in 1, excision of the sinus in 13, incision and drainage in 3,and secondary excision in 1. There was 1 postoperative wound infection.Conclusion: Diagnosis and treatment of urachal anomalies can be made with certainty if agood physical examination and proper imaging study are performed. Voidingurethrocystography might not be required in view of the fact that none of thepatients studied had an associated urinary tract anomaly
%K urachal sinus
%K patent urachus
%K urachal cyst
%K fistulography
%K sonography
%U http://memo.cgu.edu.tw/cgmj/2606/260603.pdf