%0 Journal Article
%T Appr¨¦hension syst¨¦matique des ph¨¦nom¨¨nes de d¨¦linquance et troisi¨¨me voie : les dilemmes d¡¯un parquet divis¨¦
%A Laura Aubert
%J Champ P¨¦nal
%D 2009
%I Champ p¨¦nal
%R 10.4000/champpenal.7613
%X A la fin des ann¨¦es 1980, les parquets fran ais ont cherch¨¦ ¨¤ r¨¦pondre ¨¤ l¡¯engorgement de la justice p¨¦nale et ¨¤ l¡¯inefficacit¨¦ de ses r¨¦ponses dans le traitement de la d¨¦linquance. En cr¨¦ant une troisi¨¨me voie, ils ont tent¨¦ de combiner la gestion des flux p¨¦naux avec l¡¯am¨¦lioration de leurs interventions. Or, en d¨¦pit de l¡¯h¨¦t¨¦rog¨¦n¨¦it¨¦ des pratiques alternatives mises en  uvre localement par les parquets, l¡¯¨¦volution consacr¨¦e par ce dispositif traduit moins une r¨¦novation des r¨¦ponses apport¨¦es par la justice p¨¦nale que l¡¯extension de son domaine d¡¯intervention. Cet article montre comment, paradoxalement, les controverses internes ¨¤ la magistrature sur les orientations politiques actuelles en faveur d¡¯une r¨¦ponse p¨¦nale syst¨¦matique participent de cette ¨¦volution. At the end of the 1980s, the French Public Prosecutor¡¯s Office needed to reduce the overload of cases in the criminal justice system as well as address the inefficiency of its interventions. It attempted to simultaneously resolve these two issues by creating a ¡®third way¡¯ to manage cases: the application of alternatives to criminal prosecution. Despite disparities in local implementation of alternatives to prosecution, one can remark an expansion in the scope of interventions by the Criminal Justice system, but notice little transformation in its types of responses. This paper shows to what extent internal disputations, on the government¡¯s stance for systematic criminal action within Public Prosecutor¡¯s Office, have contributed to that evolution.
%K criminal justice
%K alternatives to criminal prosecution
%K public prosecutors
%K professional ideologies
%K france.
%K justice p¨¦nale
%K alternatives aux poursuites p¨¦nales
%K magistrats du parquet
%K id¨¦ologies professionnelles
%K france.
%U http://champpenal.revues.org/7613