%0 Journal Article
%T The trial of the TRIPS Agreement in the Chinese IP law
%A Wei GUO
%J Canadian Social Science
%D 2007
%I Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
%X Recently, intellectual property right has played an important role in the world. How can this right be protected properly and people get interests from it as much as possible? This has become a hot topic currently. As one of the agreement of WTO, the TRIPS is a good answer for that question. Its protection to intellectual property right reaches an unprecedented height.However executing it in China exist problems. This dissertation shows, why those problems come, by explaining the TRIPS Agreement and the Chinese IP law and analyses their provisions to find differences and similarities between them. After that, from those differences, defects of the Chinese IP law are concluded. Some advices are suggested for amending relative laws, which is very necessary for protecting IP right in China. The dissertation point out defects of the Chinese IP law and then give some advices of amendment to perfect it. The aim is to propose a solution that link up the Chinese IP law and the TRIPS Agreement. Key words: the TRIPS Agreement, Chinese IP Law, intellectual property right, difference, defect, amendment Resum¨¦ : R¨¦cemment les droits relatifs ¨¤ la propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle ont jou¨¦ un grand r le ¨¤ travers le monde. Comment est-il possible de prot¨¦ger efficacement ce droit et ¨ºtre sur que ce soit dans le meilleur int¨¦r¨ºt possible. Ceci est actuellement devenu un sujet passionnant. En tant qu¡¯un des accords de l OMC (Organisation Mondiale du Commerce) l¡¯ADPIC est un ¨¦l¨¦ment de r¨¦ponse ¨¤ cette question.. La protection de ce dernier en terme de droit de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle ¨¤ atteint un niveau sans pr¨¦c¨¦dent. Cependant l¡¯application de ce droit en Chine soul¨¨ve certains probl¨¨mes. Cet essai illustre les causes de l apparition de ces probl¨¨mes en expliquant l¡¯accord ADPIC et la loi chinoise de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle, et analyse aussi les similarit¨¦s et diff¨¦rences entre les deux. Partant de ces diff¨¦rences, les imperfections de la loi chinoise sont ¨¦nonc¨¦es. Des suggestions sont par la suite soumises pour ajouter des amendements aux lois concern¨¦es ce qui est n¨¦cessaire pour prot¨¦ger le droit ¨¤ la propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle en Chine . Cet essai met ¨¤ jour les d¨¦fauts de la loi de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle chinoise et propose des pistes d¡¯am¨¦lioration. L¡¯objectif de ce travail est de parvenir ¨¤ une solution qui combinerait la loi de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle chinoise et l¡¯accord ADPIC. ADPIC =aspects des droits de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce Mots cl¨¦s: ADPIC, loi de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle chinoise, droit de propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle, diff¨¦rence, d¨¦f
%U http://cscanada.net/index.php/css/article/view/494