%0 Journal Article
%T De l¡¯usage des notions de   d¨¦linquants anormaux   et   d¨¦linquants d¡¯habitude   dans les l¨¦gislations allemande, belge, fran aise et suisse
%A Jean Danet
%A Claire Saas
%J Champ P¨¦nal
%D 2010
%I Champ p¨¦nal
%R 10.4000/champpenal.7955
%X L¡¯¨¦tude des dispositifs p¨¦naux r¨¦gissant les   d¨¦linquants anormaux   et les   d¨¦linquants d¡¯habitude  , au sein de quatre l¨¦gislations europ¨¦ennes, permet de mettre en ¨¦vidence la diversit¨¦ et le flou de ces notions. Dans l¡¯ensemble des dispositifs, dont l¡¯histoire n¡¯est qu¡¯extension, le l¨¦gislateur a pr¨¦vu un encadrement proc¨¦dural extr¨ºmement strict afin de rendre acceptables ces d¨¦tentions de s ret¨¦ ¨¤ dur¨¦e potentiellement illimit¨¦e. S¡¯il y est certainement parvenu, au plan national, aucune Cour constitutionnelle n¡¯ayant censur¨¦ ces dispositifs, la Cour europ¨¦enne des droits de l¡¯homme peut r¨¦server quelques fen¨ºtres de contestation. Focusing on four european systems coping with ¡®repeat criminal offenders¡¯ and ¡®mentally ill offenders¡¯ shows how diverse and vague these notions are. In each criminal system, which have continuously been extended over the ten last years, the lawmaker has implemented very strong and various procedural safeguards, in order to make acceptable that kind of deprivation of liberty without any set term. On the national level, it has certainly been a success, no constitutional Court having censored these legal provisions, the European Court for Human Rights may offer more room for challenging them.
%K dangerousness
%K repeat offences
%K mental disorder
%K security detention
%K comparative law
%K dangerosit¨¦
%K d¨¦linquance
%K troubles mentaux
%K r¨¦tention de s ret¨¦
%K droit compar¨¦
%U http://champpenal.revues.org/7955