%0 Journal Article
%T L¡¯image du   turc   dans la prose bulgare des XIXe et XXe si¨¨cles The Image of the ¡°Turk¡± in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Bulgarian Prose: Theme and variations on a Balkan identity myth
%A Marie Vrinat-Nikolov
%J Cahiers Balkaniques
%D 2012
%I INALCO
%X Dans cet article est analys¨¦e la repr¨¦sentation de l¡¯Ottoman (c¡¯est-¨¤-dire du   Turc  , comme il est massivement nomm¨¦) qui nous est donn¨¦e par les ¨¦crivains bulgares. Partant de l¡¯image n¨¦gative l¨¦gu¨¦e par le pass¨¦, depuis l¡¯Histoire slavo-bulgare ¨¦crite en 1762 par Pa ssii de Khilendar et Vie et tribulations du p¨¦cheur Sophroni, de Sophroni de Vratsa (1805-1812 ?), on suit la continuit¨¦ de cette repr¨¦sentation et des topo  qu¡¯elle engendre dans la prose bulgare de l¡¯apr¨¨s-lib¨¦ration jusqu¡¯au milieu du XXe si¨¨cle, ainsi que ses variantes, en tentant de comprendre ce qui peut motiver, dans les diff¨¦rents contextes politiques et sociaux, leur apparition : elle semble tr¨¨s li¨¦e aux avatars aussi bien de la politique int¨¦rieure et de la mani¨¨re dont est v¨¦cu l¡¯apr¨¨s-p¨¦riode ottomane, que de la politique du gouvernement bulgare ¨¤ l¡¯¨¦gard de ses ressortissants musulmans (les Pomaks) ou d¡¯origine turque, enfin des relations de la Bulgarie avec l¡¯URSS et la Turquie. On s¡¯attache enfin ¨¤ ¨¦tablir une typologie romanesque selon la mani¨¨re dont est trait¨¦ l¡¯Ottoman dans cette prose This article analyzes the portrayal of the Ottoman (generally called the ¡°Turk¡±) given to us by Bulgarian writers. Beginning with the negative image inherited from the past, since The Slavo-Bulgarian History written in 1762 by Pa sii de Khilendar and the Life and Tribulations of Sophroni the Sinner by Sophroni of Vratsa (1805-1812?), the continuity of this portrayal is followed along with that of the topo  that it encouraged in the post-liberation Bulgarian prose until the middle of the twentieth century, along with its variations. The article attempts to understand what motivated, in the different political and social contexts, the appearance of these negative images and finds that it seems very much tied to the metamorphoses in domestic politics, the way in which Bulgaria lived through the post-Ottoman period, the policies of the Bulgarian government in regard to its Muslim citizens of Turkish origins (the Pomaks), and finally Bulgaria¡¯s relations with the USSR and Turkey. Finally, a Romanesque typology will be established dealing with the manner in which the Ottoman is treated in this prose.
%K ¦¢¦Ï¦Ô¦Ë¦Ã¦Á¦Ñ ¦Á
%K ¦¯¦È¦Ø¦Ì¦Á¦Í¦É¦Ê  ¦¡¦Ô¦Ó¦Ï¦Ê¦Ñ¦Á¦Ó¦Ï¦Ñ ¦Á
%K Ottoman empire
%K nineteenth century
%K twentieth century
%K Bulgaria
%K Pa ssii of Khilendar
%K Sophroni de Vratsa
%K Sevan S¨¦vda (1945-)
%K Guintchev Tsani
%K Stoev Gu¨¨ntcho
%K Petkanov Konstantine
%K Moutaftchi¨¦va V¨¨ra
%K Dontchev Anton
%K bulgarian literature
%K litt¨¦rature bulgare
%K Pa ssii de Khilendar
%K Sophroni de Vratsa
%K Sevan S¨¦vda (1945-)
%K Guintchev Tsani
%K Stoev Gu¨¨ntcho
%K Petkanov Konstantine
%K Moutaftchi¨¦va V¨¨ra
%K Dontchev Anton
%K Bulgarie
%K Empire ottoman
%K dix-neuvi
%U http://ceb.revues.org/1567