%0 Journal Article
%T Les traductions russes de La L¨¦gende de Saint Julien L¡¯Hospitalier
%A Svetlana Maire
%J Flaubert : Revue Critique et G¨¦n¨¦tique
%D 2012
%I Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
%X Les  uvres de Gustave Flaubert ¨¦taient et restent toujours populaires aupr¨¨s du lectorat russe. La L¨¦gende de Saint Julien l¡¯Hospitalier, parue en 1876, a suscit¨¦ l¡¯int¨¦r¨ºt d¡¯un grand nombre de traducteurs. Ivan Turgenev fut le premier ¨¤ r¨¦aliser une traduction officielle en russe de la L¨¦gende en 1877. Par la suite, d¡¯autres versions ont suivi. Cet article propose l¡¯analyse de trois traductions r¨¦alis¨¦es ¨¤ trois p¨¦riodes diff¨¦rentes par trois grandes personnalit¨¦s de la litt¨¦rature russe, Ivan Turgenev, Alexandr Blok et Maximilian Volo in. Chacun d¡¯eux a sa propre m¨¦thode de traduction, utilise ses propres proc¨¦d¨¦s afin de restituer au mieux l¡¯effet de stylisation cr¨¦¨¦ par Gustave Flaubert. La distance temporelle qui existe entre les trois traductions suppose que chacune d¡¯elles suive les tendances litt¨¦raires propres ¨¤ son ¨¦poque. Ainsi, l¡¯analyse comparative des traductions sera men¨¦e sous un angle diachronique. Par ailleurs, la traduction de chacun d¡¯eux refl¨¨te les tendances dominantes dans le d¨¦veloppement des diff¨¦rentes conceptions du m¨¦tier du traducteur et plus particuli¨¨rement sur le travail de stylisation historique. The Russian reader has always been lost in admiration at Gustave Flaubert¡¯s production, which is particularly style-worked and of a high literary quality. The Legend of St. Julian the Hospitaller, wrote in 1876, is marked out by stylistic treasures where the form is also important as the content. Consequently, this text represents a difficult translation exercise. However, the text has always aroused interest of translators. It was in the year 1877 that Ivan Turgenev first translated it into Russian and after that various versions with distinctive features have been turning up. This paper consists on examining three versions carried out for the three different periods by three eminent personalities of the Russian literature, Ivan Turgenev, Alexandr Blok, Maximilian Volo in. Each of them has his own translation method, uses his own devices in order to restore as best as possible Flaubert¡¯s stylized descriptions. The temporal distance, which exists between three translations, supposes that each of them follow the literary trends peculiar for their period. So, the comparative analysis of the translations is going to be made under a diachronic angle. Besides, the translation of each of them reflects dominant trends in the development of the various conceptions of the translator¡¯s profession and more particularly on the work of the historic stylization.
%U http://flaubert.revues.org/1649