%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of two techniques of fault tree analysis and Tripod-Beta using the analytic hierrarchy process for accidents analysis in a steel-manufacturing industry
%A Effat Lali-Dastjerdi
%A Iraj Mohammadfam
%J Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research
%D 2012
%I 
%X Background and Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the two techniques of fault tree analysis (FTA) and Tripod-Beta using the analytic hierrarchy process (AHP) for choosing the preferred technique to be used in the analysis of grave accidents in a steel-manufacturing company. Materials and Methods: This research project was carried out in three main phases.  In the first phase two disastrous accidents were sketched for analysis and, using the two techniques of FTA and Tripod-Beta, the causes for their occurrence were determined. In the second phase 7 criteria were chosen for comparing the two techniques. Finally, in the third phase, the two techniques were compared on the basis of chosen criteria, using AHP. Results: The findings showed that the criterion for the number of accidents' agents with a priority of 0.435 had the highest priority, followed by quantitative ability, cost of analysis, time spending, and software need with a priority of  0.07,  0.059,  0.038,  and 0.036, respectively. Conclusion: Considering all the chosen criteria, it can be concluded that the fault free analysis technique with a priority of 0.624 is superior to Tripod Beta technique with priority a priority of 0.35.  Key words: Accidents analysis, Steel-manufacturing industry, FTA, Tripod Beta, AHP
%K Accidents analysis
%K Steel-manufacturing industry
%K FTA
%K Tripod Beta
%K AHP
%U http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/21253.pdf&manuscript_id=21253