%0 Journal Article
%T La conception ric urienne de la raison pratique: Dialectique ou ¨¦clectique? La conception ricoeurienne de la raison pratique: dialectique ou ¨¦clectique?
%A Laurent Jaffro
%J ¨¦tudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
%D 2012
%I University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
%R 10.5195/errs.2012.73
%X This article examines and discusses the presuppositions behind the answer that Paul Ric ur brought to the question ¡°What is practical reason?¡± in a series of studies that led to the ¡°little ethics¡± of Oneself as Another.  The conception defended by Ric ur is presented as a sort of reconciliation, or composition, of Aristotelian ethics and Kantian morality. Two problems in particular are raised: the first is raised by the questionable nature of Ric ur¡¯s interpretation of the positions that he synthesizes; the second concerns the model - dialectic or eclectic ¨C of this synthesis. L¡¯article examine et discute les pr¨¦suppos¨¦s de la r¨¦ponse que Paul Ric ur a apport¨¦e ¨¤ la question ¡°qu¡¯est-ce que la rationalit¨¦ pratique?¡± dans une s¨¦rie d¡¯¨¦tudes qui aboutit ¨¤ la ¡°petite ¨¦thique¡± de Soi-m¨ºme comme un autre. La conception d¨¦fendue par Ric ur se pr¨¦sente comme une sorte de conciliation, ou de composition, de l¡¯¨¦thique aristot¨¦licienne et de la morale kantienne. Deux probl¨¨mes se posent en particulier: le premier est pos¨¦ par le caract¨¨re contestable de l¡¯interpr¨¦tation par Ric ur des positions qu¡¯il synth¨¦tise; le second concerne le mod¨¨le, dialectique ou ¨¦clectique, de cette synth¨¨se.
%K Ethics
%K Univeralization
%K Paul Ric ur
%K Kant
%K Aristotle
%U http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/73