%0 Journal Article %T <sup>99m</sup>Tc in the evaluation of microleakage of composite resin restorations with SonicFill<sup>TM</sup>. An <i>in vitro</i> experimental model %A Carrilho Eunice %A Abrantes Margarida %A Casalta-Lopes Jo£¿o %A Botelho Filomena %A Paula Anabela %A Ambr¨®sio Pedro %A Marto Carlos Miguel %A Rebelo Diana %A Marques Joana %A Polido M¨¢rio %A Ferreira Manuel Marques %J Open Journal of Stomatology %P 340-347 %@ 2160-8717 %D 2012 %I Scientific Research Publishing %R 10.4236/ojst.2012.24058 %X Introduction: The composite SonicFillTM (Kerr/Kavo) is indicated for posterior restorations, with a single increment up to 5 mm due to reduced polymerization shrinkage, thus reducing working time. Aim: Evaluation of marginal microleakage with SonicFillTM. Method and Materials: There were sectioned sixty noncarious human molars in the occluso-cervical direction. Class V cavities were prepared on each tooth with gingival margin walls in a standardized way. The specimens were divided into 4 groups: group 1¡ªrestored with SonicFillTM (Kerr/Kavo), group 2¡ªrestored with FiltekTM SupremeXTE (3M ESPE), group 3¡ªthe cavities were not restored; group 4¡ªrestored with SonicFillTM (Kerr/Kavo). In groups 1, 2 and 4 the enamel was conditioned with 37% orthophosphoric acid and applied the self-etch adhesive system Clear- fillTM SE BOND (Kuraray). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37?C for 7 days. After, the specimens, were immersed in a solution of 99mTc-Pertechnetate and the radioactivity was assessed with a gamma camera. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction at a significance level of 5% were used for the statistical analyses. Results: There are significant differences between the positive and negative control groups and between these and experimental groups (p < 0.05). There are no statistically significant differences between the specimens restored with SonicFillTM and FiltekTM SupremeXTE. Conclusion: The new composite SonicFillTM and FiltekTM SupremeXTE showed no difference concerning dye penetration. The Sonic- FillTM restorative system showed no influence in concerning microleakage. %K Posterior resin Composites %K Composite Restorations %K Polymerization Stress %K Polymerization Shrinkage %K Microleakage %K Thermocycling %U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=25553