%0 Journal Article
%T Acupuncture in ancient China: How important was it really?
%A Hanjo Lehmann
%J Journal of Integrative Medicine (JIM)
%D 2013
%I Science Press
%X Although acupuncture theory is a fundamental part of the Huangdi Neijing, the clinical application of the needle therapy in ancient China was always a limited one. From early times there have been warnings that acupuncture might do harm. In books like Zhang Zhongjing¡¯s Shanghanlun it plays only a marginal role. Among the 400 emperors in Chinese history, acupuncture was hardly ever applied. After Xu Dachun called acupuncture a ¡°lost tradition¡± in 1757, the abolition of acupuncture and moxibustion from the Imperial Medical Academy in 1822 was a radical, but consequent act. When traditional Chinese medicine was revived after 1954, the ¡°New Acupuncture¡± was completely different from what it had been in ancient China. The conclusion, however, is a positive one: The best time acupuncture ever had was not the Song dynasty or Yuan dynasty, but is now ¨C and the future of acupuncture does not lie in old scripts, but in ourselves.
%K acupuncture
%K acupuncture moxibustion science
%K traditional Chinese medicine
%K history of medicine
%U http://www.jcimjournal.com/jim/showAbstrPage.aspx?articleID=jintegrmed2013008