%0 Journal Article
%T Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western U. P.
%A Abhilasha Gupta
%A Aruna Verma
%A Jyoti Chauhan
%J International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
%D 2013
%I Medip Academy
%R 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20130619
%X Background: Comparative evaluation of PPIUCD and interval IUCD in terms of incidence of failure, expulsions, bleeding P/V and other complications. Methods: Total 300 willing women after counselling in antenatal, early labor or postnatal period were inserted PPIUCD after excluding chorioamnionitis, PROM >18hrs, Unresolved PPH, Puerperal sepsis. Another 150 willing women were inserted interval IUCD after excluding contraindications. All were followed up for 6 months. Results: Expulsion rate was significantly higher in PPIUCD as compared to interval insertions (4.3% v/s 2.0%; p value< 0.05). Number of removal of IUCD was almost similar in both groups(5.6% v/s 6.0%) but bleeding as a cause of removal was significantly more in interval group(23.5% v/s 88.5%). Common causes of PPIUCD removal were social. Conclusions: Postpartum insertion of IUCD is safe effective, feasible and reversible method of contraception. [Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2(2.000): 204-208]
%K PPIUCD
%K Interval IUCD
%K Acceptance
%K Safety
%U http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=35239