%0 Journal Article
%T The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: A pluralogue part 2: Issues of conservatism and pragmatism in psychiatric diagnosis
%A James Phillips
%A Allen Frances
%A Michael A Cerullo
%A John Chardavoyne
%A Hannah S Decker
%A Michael B First
%A Nassir Ghaemi
%A Gary Greenberg
%A Andrew C Hinderliter
%A Warren A Kinghorn
%A Steven G LoBello
%A Elliott B Martin
%A Aaron L Mishara
%A Joel Paris
%A Joseph M Pierre
%A Ronald W Pies
%A Harold A Pincus
%A Douglas Porter
%A Claire Pouncey
%A Michael A Schwartz
%A Thomas Szasz
%A Jerome C Wakefield
%A G Waterman
%A Owen Whooley
%A Peter Zachar
%J Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1747-5341-7-8
%X For the full text of the General Introduction to the entire article, the reader is referred to Part 1 [1]. The General Introduction reviewed the history of the article, which originated in a controversy initiated by Robert Spitzer and Allen Frances, Chairmen respectively of the DSM-III and DSM-IV Task Forces, over the ongoing work of the DSM-5 Task Force and Work Groups. In a series of articles and blog postings in Psychiatric Times, Frances (at times with Spitzer) carried out a sustained critique of the DSM-5 work in which he focused both on issues of transparency and issues of process and content [2-15].In the course of this debate over DSM-5 I proposed to Allen in early 2010 that we use the pages of the Bulletin of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry (of which I am Editor) to expand and bring more voices into the discussion. This led to two issues of the Bulletin in2010 devoted to conceptual issues in DSM-5 [16,17]. (Vol 17, No 1 of the AAPP Bulletin will be referred to as Bulletin 1, and Vol 17, No 2 will be referred to as Bulletin 2. Both are available at http://alien.dowling.edu/~cperring/aapp/bulletin.htm.) Interest in this topic is reflected in the fact that the second Bulletin issue, with commentaries on Frances¡¯ extended response in the first issue, and his responses to the commentaries, reached over 70,000 words.Also in 2010, as Frances continued his critique through blog postings in Psychiatric Times, John Sadler and I began a series of regular, DSM-5 conceptual issues blogs in the same journal [18-31].With the success of the Bulletin symposium, we approached the editor of PEHM, James Giordano, about using the pages of PEHM to continue the DSM-5 discussion under a different format, and with the goal of reaching a broader audience. The new format would be a series of ¡°essential questions¡± for DSM-5, commentaries by a series of individuals (some of them commentators from the Bulletin issues, others making a first appearance in
%U http://www.peh-med.com/content/7/1/8