%0 Journal Article
%T Ultrasonic Guided Waves-Based Monitoring of Rail Head: Laboratory and Field Tests
%A Piervincenzo Rizzo
%A Marcello Cammarata
%A Ivan Bartoli
%A Francesco Lanza di Scalea
%A Salvatore Salamone
%A Stefano Coccia
%A Robert Phillips
%J Advances in Civil Engineering
%D 2010
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.1155/2010/291293
%X Recent train accidents have reaffirmed the need for developing a rail defect detection system more effective than that currently used. One of the most promising techniques in rail inspection is the use of ultrasonic guided waves and noncontact probes. A rail inspection prototype based on these concepts and devoted to the automatic damage detection of defects in rail head is the focus of this paper. The prototype includes an algorithm based on wavelet transform and outlier analysis. The discrete wavelet transform is utilized to denoise ultrasonic signals and to generate a set of relevant damage sensitive data. These data are combined into a damage index vector fed to an unsupervised learning algorithm based on outlier analysis that determines the anomalous conditions of the rail. The first part of the paper shows the prototype in action on a railroad track mock-up built at the University of California, San Diego. The mock-up contained surface and internal defects. The results from three experiments are presented. The importance of feature selection to maximize the sensitivity of the inspection system is demonstrated here. The second part of the paper shows the results of field testing conducted in south east Pennsylvania under the auspices of the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration. 1. Introduction Safety statistics data from the US Federal Railroad Administration [1, 2] indicate that train accidents caused by track failures including rail, joint bars and anchoring resulted in 2700 derailments and 441£¿M in direct costs, during the 1992¨C2002 decade. The primary cause of these accidents is the ¡®transverse defect¡¯ type that was found responsible for 541 derailments and 91£¿M in cost during the same period. Transverse defects are cracks developing in a direction perpendicular to the rail running direction, and include transverse fissures, initiated inside the rail head, and detail fractures, initiated at the head surface as rolling contact fatigue defects. The most common methods of rail inspection are magnetic induction and contact ultrasonic testing [3¨C5]. The first method is affected by environmental magnetic noise and it requires a small lift-off distance for the sensors in order to produce adequate sensitivity [6, 7]. Ultrasonic testing is conventionally performed from the top of the rail head in a pulse-echo configuration. In this system, ultrasonic transducers are located inside a water-filled wheel and are oriented at 0¡ã from the surface of the rail head to detect horizontal cracks and at 70¡ã to detect transverse cracks. Such an approach suffers from
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ace/2010/291293/