%0 Journal Article
%T Directed Motion and Non-Predicative Path P
%A Minjeong Son
%J Nordlyd : Troms£¿ University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics / Institutt for Spr£¿k og Litteratur, Universitetet i Troms£¿
%D 2006
%I University of Troms?
%X In this paper, I argue that an atelic path PP headed by -(u)lo ¡®toward¡¯ in Korean is an argument of a directed motion verb on a par with its telic counterpart headed by the locative -ey ¡®(be) AT¡¯. I further argue that, despite having the same argumental status, the atelic path PP is distinguished from the goal-marking locative PP in terms of an entailment of a result state and predicativity; while the goal PP in directed motion constructions forms a secondary predicate associated with a resultative interpretation, the atelic path PP merges with the verb as a non-predicative complement and does not license a resultative interpretation.
%K argumental/argumenthood
%K aspectual marker
%K atelic
%K atelic path PP
%K directed motion
%K directional PP
%K do-so
%K endpoint
%K locative PP
%K manner-of-motion verbs
%K path
%K postpositions
%K predicative
%K resultative
%K secondary predication
%U http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/80