%0 Journal Article
%T EXISTE RELACI車N ENTRE LOS PERFILES DE INVESTIGACI車N DE LOS IPs Y LA CALIFICACI車N DE SUS PROPUESTAS DE INVESTIGACI車N? EL CASO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES
%A Susana S芍nchez-Gil
%A El赤as Sanz-Casado
%J Revista Iberoamericana de Psicolog赤a y Salud
%D 2012
%I Sociedad Universitaria de Investigaci車n en Psicolog赤a y Salud
%X The present study aims at determining and comparing the characteristics of scientific activity described in the curricula vitae (CV) of the head researchers appearing in Social Sciences proposals for projects under the Spanish National R&D+I Plan, 2004-2007. In all, 149 proposals were studied: 62 were classified as excellent and 87 as questionable by the National Evaluation and Foresight Agency (Spanish initials, ANEP), accounting respectively for 10% and 13% of all submitted proposals. In the case of the researchers＊ CVs, 83% of excellent proposals and 77% of questionable ones were studied. The advantage of using curricula as the source of the raw data was that the scientific profile of the researchers analysed could be identified and classified on the basis of funded research, international mobility, researcher training and scientific production. Both the research proposals and the CVs have been classified according to the of Social Sciences-ANEP sub area in which they were evaluated.
%K curricula vitae
%K research proposal
%K scientific activity
%K social sciences
%K bibliometric study.
%U http://webs.uvigo.es/suips/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=40&Itemid=63