%0 Journal Article %T National Treatment, National Interest and the Public Domain %A Margaret Ann Wilkinson %J University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal %D 2003 %I %X [] The concept of the ¡°public domain¡± is a powerful rhetorical element in the policy debates involving intellectual property. But is it a stable and useful concept for analyzing information issues? Can the notion of the public domain and the concept of the information commons be separated? Is the notion of the public domain merely another way of expressing the public interest? This paper canvassed the literature, seeking a theoretically consistent definition for public domain that was equally applicable across the copyright, trademark and patent spheres. The analysis demonstrated that there is no such construct. The paper also reviews the findings of those who have tried to empirically demonstrate the ambit of the public domain and illustrates that the problems of definition identified as part of the canvas of theoretical approaches also plague attempts to create a consistent empirical picture. However, these attempts themselves demonstrate, despite the long international commitment to intellectual property, how nationally jurisdictionally bound each description of the public domain is.Finally, although the public domain concept may be recognized as having value as an explanatory device, given its limited theoretical and descriptive value, one may question its role as rhetoric affecting policy development. Given the etymological roots of the concept of the public domain, in an agrarian-rooted property context, and given the multidimensional complexities of the current information society, the paper concludes that the notion of the public domain can lead to an oversimplification of the environment within which intellectual property devices operate.*****[R¨¦sum¨¦] Le concept de domaine public est un ¨¦l¨¦ment rh¨¦torique puissant dans les d¨¦bats politiques sur la propri¨¦t¨¦ intellectuelle. Mais est-ce un concept stable et utile pour l¡¯analyse de l¡¯information? La notion de domaine public et le concept de mise en commun de l¡¯information sont-ils dissociables? La notion de domaine public est-elle simplement une autre fa on de faire r¨¦f¨¦rence ¨¤ l¡¯int¨¦r¨ºt public? Cet article fait un survol de la documentation, en qu¨ºte d¡¯une d¨¦finition th¨¦orique coh¨¦rente de la notion de domaine public qui s¡¯applique dans les sph¨¨res tant du droit d¡¯auteur que des marques de commerce et des brevets. L¡¯¨¦tude n¡¯a r¨¦v¨¦l¨¦ aucune d¨¦finition de ce genre. L¡¯article passe aussi en revue les conclusions des personnes qui ont cherch¨¦ ¨¤ d¨¦montrer de fa on empirique la port¨¦e de la notion de domaine public. Il ressort que la d¨¦finition de cette notion pr¨¦sente un probl¨¨me dans le cadre tant %U http://www.uoltj.ca/articles/vol1.1-2/2003-2004.1.1-2.uoltj.Wilkinson.23-49.pdf