%0 Journal Article
%T La compraventa a un imp迆ber sin autorizaci車n del tutor: Un estado de la cuesti車n en torno a D. 41,4,2,15 Purchase and Sale Agreement Entered Into With an Underage without the Tutor's Authorization: A Status Questionis on D. 41,4,2,15
%A Patricio-Ignacio Carvajal
%J Revista de estudios hist車rico-jur赤dicos
%D 2011
%I Ediciones Universitarias de Valpara赤so
%X El fragmento conservado en D. 41,4,2,15 ofrece un caso de f芍cil comprensi車n. El adquirente, en virtud de una compraventa celebrada con un imp迆ber, puede adquirir la cosa por usucapio si acaso pens車 que el vendedor era p迆ber. Pero la justificaci車n que ofrece Paulo: "plus est in re quam in existimatione", se opone a la soluci車n habitual, que vincula el caso con la buena fe-creencia del comprador. Por tanto, la soluci車n resulta desvinculada de su motivaci車n. Desde la Glosa se explic車 el caso como de una compraventa a non domino. Para Cujacius y otros pensaron que el texto original deb赤a decir: "plus est in existimatione quam in re", u otras formulaciones similares. En el siglo XVII, Jos谷 Fern芍ndez de Retes, inaugur車 una lectura objetiva del pasaje, que separa el problema presentado por el dictum del texto de la creencia del comprador. En el siglo XX se consider車 corrupto el pasaje. The fragment kept in D. 41,4,2,15 offers a case that can be easily understood. The buyer, by virtue of a purchase and sale agreement entered into with an underage, can buy the thing based on usucapio as long as s/he thought that the salesperson was underage. However, the justification Paulo offers: "plus est in re quam in existimatione", opposes to the common solution that links the case with the good faith-belief of the buyer. Therefore, the solution turns out to be unrelated to its motivation. From the commentary, we explain the case as a non domino purchase and sale. Cujacius and others thought that the original text might have stated: "plus est in existimationequam in re", or other similar statements. In the 17th century, Jos谷 Fern芍ndez de Retes submitted an objective reading of the text, which separates the problem presented by the dictum of the text from the buyer's belief. The text was considered to be corrupt in the 20th century.
%K Compraventa
%K Buena fe
%K T赤tulo
%K Causa pro emptore
%K T赤tulo putativo
%K Purchase and sale
%K Good faith
%K Title
%K pro emptore Cause
%K Presumptive title
%U http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-54552011000100004