%0 Journal Article
%T THE TURKIC LANGUAGES AND THEIR DEMOGRAPHIC IMPORTANCE DIE TURKSPRACHEN UND IHRE DEMOGRAPHISCHE BEDEUTUNG T¨¹RK D LLER  VE DEMOGRAF K  NEM
%A £¿hsan Y£¿lmaz BAYRAKTARLI
%J Turkish Studies
%D 2012
%I Turkish studies publisher
%X The paper discusses the Turk languages, respectively the Altai languages from the important aspects as classification, transcription as well as distribution and history. The family relationships among the Ural-Altaic are also an important aspect. The classification, distribution and number of speaker of the Uralic is also anchored, intentional and irrespective of the existence of a relationship.Especially the classification of the ur- Altaic and its derivates are treated illustratively. Hereby, perspectives different experts are briefly outlined. These perspectives as well as the illustrations are based on the turkology, respectively on the accepted sources in the field of UralAltaic.The paper comprises new constructive ideas as well as contrastive comparisons. The linguistic records of experts were treated preferential. Despite intented to analyse the development, distribution and classification of the Ural-Altaic language group in general, the Turk languages are favored due to their spread, high number of speaker and their varying transcription. Furthermore, the demographic significance of the turk languages are not fully understood. Turkologists treat this subject justifiably subject-specific and mostly very complicated. Hence, the paper is expected to fill a gap through its different perspective Bu  al  mada T¨¹rk Dillerinin, daha do rusu Altay Dilllerinin tarihi, yay ld    co rafya, bu dillerin yaz  sistemleri ve s n fland r lmalar  ve bu konuda yap lan tart  malar b¨¹t¨¹n y nleri ile incelenmektedir. Ayn  zamanda altay ve ural dil gruplar n n akrabal    konu edilmektedir. Burada Ural dil grubu ile Altay dil grubu k kenleri itibari ile sanki ayni bir  lk-Dilden geliyormu  gibi s n fland r ld , yay ld    co rafya ve bu dilleri konu anlar n say sal da  l m  da ayn   ekilde bu  al  mada incelendi.  zellikle  lk-Altayca ve onun t¨¹revlerinin s n fland r lmas   izimlerle desteklendi.  izelgelerin ortaya   kar lmas nda de i ik kanatlardan bilim adamlar n n fikirleri  nemle dikkate al nd .  izimler olsun di er de erlendirmeler olsun hepsi Ural-Altay dilleri alan nda uzman bilim adamlar n n d¨¹ ¨¹ncelerine dayand r ld .  al  ma bir  ok yeni ve yap c  fikri ortaya koyarken ayn  zamanda da konuyla alakal  muhalif fikirlere de yeterince yer vermektedir. Ural ve Altay Dil gruplar n n akrabal k konusunda yap lan tart  malar n  nemine binaen, lenguistik delillere  ncelikle yer verilmi tir. Japonya¡¯dan Orta-Avrupa¡¯ya kadar geni  bir co rafyaya yay lm   olan bu dillerin  nemi yeterince anla  lmad    ortadad r. Genelde T¨¹rkologlar n  zellikle de bat l  T¨¹rkologlar n yapm
%K Language politics
%K Turcology
%K Linguistics
%K Ethnology
%K Linguistic history Dil politikalar
%K T¨¹rkoloji
%K Lenguistik
%K Etnoloji
%K Dil tarihi
%U http://turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/886061302_17_bayraktarl%C4%B1ihsany%C4%B1lmaz_233-259.pdf