%0 Journal Article %T SUDI¡äS CRITICS TO EM¡äI IN THE ERH-I GULISTAN RELATING TO THE DIFFERENCES FROM THE SOUND MANUSCRIPTS AND CHOOSE THE BEST FROM MANUSCRIPTS S D ¡äN N ERH- G¨¹L STAN¡äDA EM¡ä ¡äYE Y NELTT SAH H N¨¹SHALARA MUHALEFET VE N¨¹SHA TERC H LE LG L ELE T R LER %A £¿brahim KAYA %J Turkish Studies %D 2012 %I Turkish studies publisher %X Sudi is an author who wrote interpretation of Hafiz Divan, Bostan and Gulistan which are essential Persian classics and were read widely in the world as well as in Ottoman Empire with great pleasure. In Sudi¡¯s erh-i Gulistan, there are many critics about the previous interpretations of Gulistan. One of the targets of the critics is em¡¯i. In the work, there are critics on em¡¯i approximately in five hundred places. Although these critics are complicated in some ways, these can be grouped into three main titles: The critics relating to the differences from the main copy, the critics on meaning and the critics on grammar, style and verse forms. In this article, brief information about both interpreters and their interpretations about Gulistan will be given. After this introduction, Sudi¡¯s critics on em¡¯i¡¯s carelessness and mistakes to determine the sound texts and differences from the main copy will be classified and these critics and justifications will be explained in details. Consequently it will be tried to determine which annotator is more accurate in his justifications. S d Fars edebiyat n n temel klasiklerinden olan ve b¨¹t¨¹n d¨¹nyada oldu u gibi Osmanl imparatorlu unun h¨¹k¨¹m s¨¹rd¨¹ ¨¹ co rafyada da b¨¹y¨¹k bir takdir ve be eniyle okunan Haf z Divan , Bostan ve G¨¹listan¡äa erh yazm bir ahsiyettir. S d ¡änin erh-i G¨¹listan¡äda kendinden nce G¨¹listan¡äa erh yazanlarla ilgili bir hayli ele tirisi bulunmaktad r. Bu ele tirilerin hedefindeki ahsiyetlerden biri de em¡ä ¡ädir. Eserde yakla k be y¨¹z yerde em¡ä ¡äyi hedef alan ele tiriler bulunmaktad r. Bu ele tiriler baz y nlerden i i e girmi bir hal alsa da bunlar Sa lam N¨¹shalara Muhalefet Etmekle lgili Ele tiriler, Anlamla lgili Ele tiriler ve Dilbilgisi, ¨¹sl p ve Naz m ekilleri ile lgili Ele tirilerolarak ¨¹ ana ba l k alt nda toplamak m¨¹mk¨¹nd¨¹r. Bu al mada her iki arihin hayat ve G¨¹listan¡äa yazd klar erh hakk nda k saca bilgi verildikten sonra em¡ä ¡änin sa lam bir metin tespitindeki dikkatsizlik ve yanl l klar ve sa lam n¨¹shalara muhalefet etmesi ve n¨¹sha tercihine dair S d ¡änin kendisine y neltti i ele tiriler s n fland r lacak, bu ele tiriler ve gerek eleri ayr nt l olarak ele al nd ktan sonra her iki arihten hangisinin hakl oldu u g sterilmeye al lacakt r. %K Sudi %K erh-i Gulistan %K em¡äi %K Gulistan %K Interpretation %K Annotator S d %K erh-i G¨¹listan %K em¡ä %K G¨¹listan %K erh %K arih %U http://turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/1072100813_43_kayaibrahim_649-674.pdf