%0 Journal Article
%T TOM芍S DE AQUINO Y LA TEOLOG赤A POSITIVA THOMAS AQUINAS AND POSITIVE THEOLOGY
%A Julio Antonio Castello Dubra
%J Phil車sophos : Revista de Filosofia
%D 2011
%I 
%R 10.5216/phi.v16i1.12507
%X A lo largo de su obra Tom芍s es coherente en sostener que no conocemos acerca de Dios qu谷 es, sino m芍s bien qu谷 no es. No tenemos un conocimiento directo de la esencia divina en esta vida. Sin embargo, a partir del De potentia y en la Suma teol車gica, Tom芍s argumenta que los nombres que designan las perfecciones divinas 每ser, bondad, sabidur赤a, etc.每 no son t谷rminos meramente negativos o relacionales, sino que se dicen substantialiter de Dios, esto es, que significan la sustancia divina misma, aunque imperfectamente. El trabajo intenta analizar cu芍l es el status del tipo de conocimiento que presupone esa atribuci車n, y qu谷 implicancias tiene para la evaluaci車n del car芍cter negativo o positivo de la teolog赤a natural de Tom芍s. Throughout his work Aquinas is consistent in holding that, about God, we do not know what He is but rather what He is not. We do not have a direct knowledge of divine essence in this life. However, from his De potentia onwards, and in the Summa theologiae, Thomas argues that the names which mean divine perfections 每being, goodness, wisdom and the like每 are not merely negative or relational terms, but are predicated substantialiter of God. That means they signify the very divine substance, though imperfectly. The paper tries to analyze what type of knowledge this attribution presupposes, and according to this, to what extent his natural theology can be assessed as negative or positive.
%K Tom芍s de Aquino
%K teolog赤a
%K atributos divinos
%K Pseudo Dionisio.
%U http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/philosophos/article/view/12507