%0 Journal Article
%T As especificidades do debate p¨²blico sobre as grandes infraestruturas. O caso de G¨¦nova The Specificities of the Public Debate on Large Infrastructures. The Case of Genoa Les sp¨¦cificit¨¦s du d¨¦bat public sur les grandes infrastructures. Le cas de G¨ºnes
%A Luigi Bobbio
%J Revista Cr¨ªtica de Ci¨ºncias Sociais
%D 2012
%I Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra
%R 10.4000/rccs.4201
%X O primeiro caso em It¨¢lia de debate p¨²blico ¡®¨¤ francesa¡¯ sobre uma grande infraestrutura desenrolou se em G¨¦nova, em 2009, sobre o projecto de desvio de uma auto estrada que contorna a cidade. Este artigo analisa as caracter¨ªsticas desse dispositivo com base na experi¨ºncia genovesa: o conflito na origem do debate, a independ¨ºncia da comiss o encarregada de o gerir, a organiza  o do processo e a transpar¨ºncia da informa  o, a mobiliza  o das comunidades locais e o confronto em torno do problema da sua representa  o, o desequil¨ªbrio na participa  o dos cidad os, as discuss es sobre a oportunidade e as caracter¨ªsticas do projecto, a natureza do debate (entre confronto e delibera  o) e, por fim, o seu resultado. O artigo termina com uma discuss o sobre a ¡°ambival¨ºncia¡± do debate p¨²blico de modelo franc¨ºs. The first Italian example of a public debate based on the French model regarding a large infrastructure was held in Genoa in 2009 and focused on a project intended to modify a ring road that encircles the city. This essay analyses the characteristics of such an instrument from the perspective of the Genoa experience: the conflict which was at the origin of the debate, the independence of the commission set to manage it, the organisation of the process and the transparency of information, the mobilisation of the local communities and the confrontation over the issue of representation, the imbalance in citizens¡¯ participation, the discussions on the suitability and features of the project, the nature of the debate (between confrontation and deliberation), and finally its concrete results. The article ends with a discussion of the ambivalence of a ¡°French-style¡± public debate. En Italie, le premier cas de d¨¦bat public ¡®¨¤ la fran aise¡¯ sur une grande infrastructure eut lieu ¨¤ G¨ºnes, en 2009, sur le projet de d¨¦tournement d¡¯une autoroute qui contourne la ville. Cet article analyse les caract¨¦ristiques de ce dispositif sur la base de l¡¯exp¨¦rience g¨¦noise: le conflit ¨¤ l¡¯origine du d¨¦bat, l¡¯ind¨¦pendance de la commission charg¨¦e de le g¨¦rer, l¡¯organisation du proc¨¨s et la transparence de l¡¯information, la mobilisation des communaut¨¦s locales et la confrontation autour du probl¨¨me de sa repr¨¦sentation, le d¨¦s¨¦quilibre de la participation des citoyens, les d¨¦bats quant ¨¤ l¡¯opportunit¨¦ et aux caract¨¦ristiques du projet, la nature du d¨¦bat (entre confrontation et d¨¦lib¨¦ration) et, enfin, son r¨¦sultat. L¡¯article s¡¯ach¨¨ve par une discussion sur l¡¯¡°ambivalence¡± du d¨¦bat public de mod¨¨le fran ais.
%K political participation
%K conflicts
%K public debate
%K deliberative democracy
%K urban infrastructure
%K participation politique
%K conflits
%K d¨¦bat public
%K d¨¦mocratie d¨¦lib¨¦rative
%K infrastructures urbaines
%K participa  o pol¨ªtica
%K conflitos
%K debate p¨²blico
%K democracia deliberativa
%K infraestruturas urbanas
%U http://rccs.revues.org/4201