%0 Journal Article
%T Julgamentos penais em per¨ªodos de transi  o e o desafio das emo  es: Hist¨®rias de dois pa¨ªses Transitional Criminal Trials and the Emotional Challenge: Tales from Two Countries Jugements p¨¦naux en p¨¦riodes de transition et le d¨¦fi des ¨¦motions : histoire de deux pays
%A Mihaela Mihai
%J Revista Cr¨ªtica de Ci¨ºncias Sociais
%D 2012
%I Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra
%R 10.4000/rccs.1728
%X O artigo visa analisar o modo como dois tribunais nacionais proferiram senten as penais em circunstancias de mobiliza  o emocional e tens o pol¨ªtica. As decis es a que se chegou na Argentina depois de 1983 e na Rom¨¦nia, ap¨®s o fim da ditadura de Ceau escu, ilustram a forma como os afectos dos cidad os influenciam as delibera  es dos tribunais no ambito de processos penais. Ambos os casos demonstram como o poder judicial teve de entrar em di¨¢logo com pedidos de repara  o ressentidos e indignados. No entanto, enquanto o tribunal argentino filtrou as emo  es garantindo um respeito igual por ambas as partes, impulsionando, assim, a causa da justi a democr¨¢tica, o caso romeno serve de advert¨ºncia sobre a maneira como n o se deve usar o direito penal para corrigir erros cometidos. Estes dois casos oferecem nos duas importantes li  es acerca tanto dos obst¨¢culos como das oportunidades associados ¨¤s emo  es p¨²blicas durante per¨ªodos de transforma  o pol¨ªtica radical. The paper seeks to analyse how two domestic courts decided criminal trials under circumstances of emotional mobilisation and political stress. Decisions from Argentina after 1983 and Romania after Ceau escu¡¯s dictatorship illustrate how citizens¡¯ affects influence courts¡¯ choices within penal cases. Both cases show how the judiciary had to enter a dialogue with resentful and indignant claims for redress. However, while the Argentinean court filtered emotions through the strainer of equal respect and thus pushed the cause of democratic justice ahead, the Romanian case serves as a cautionary tale about how not to correct injustices through criminal law. These two cases provide us with important lessons about the obstacles, but also the opportunities, associated with public emotions during periods of radical political transformation. L¡¯article a pour but d¡¯analyser la fa on dont deux tribunaux nationaux rendent des jugements p¨¦naux en des circonstances de mobilisation ¨¦motionnelle et de tension politique. Les d¨¦cisions qui ont abouti en Argentine apr¨¨s 1983 et en Roumanie apr¨¨s la fin de la dictature de Ceau escu, illustrent bien la fa on dont les sentiments des citoyens influencent les d¨¦lib¨¦rations des tribunaux dans le cadre de proc¨¨s p¨¦naux. Les deux cas d¨¦montrent comment il fallut que le pouvoir judicaire ¨¦tablisse un dialogue face aux demandes de r¨¦paration ressentis et indign¨¦s. N¨¦anmoins, alors que le tribunal argentin filtra les ¨¦motions en garantissant un respect ¨¦gal ¨¤ chaque partie, donnant de la sorte une impulsion ¨¤ la cause de la justice d¨¦mocratique, le cas roumain sert d¡¯avis quant ¨¤
%K judicial power
%K Argentina
%K transitional justice
%K manifest emotions
%K trials
%K penal case
%K damage reparation
%K Romania
%K victimizers
%K pouvoir judiciaire
%K Argentine
%K justice de transition
%K ¨¦motions manifestes
%K jugements
%K proc¨¨s p¨¦nal
%K r¨¦paration des dommages
%K Roumanie
%K agresseurs
%K Argentina
%K poder judicial
%K justi a de transi  o
%K emo  es manifestas
%K julgamentos
%K processo penal
%K repara  o de danos
%K Rom¨¦nia
%K vitimadores
%U http://rccs.revues.org/1728