%0 Journal Article
%T Confusion-Bewildering of Architecture on Real(ity) and Represent(ation)...!= Ger ek(lik) ve temsil(iyet) ¨¹zerine mimarl   n  a k nl   ...!
%A Havva Alkan Bala
%A Dicle Ayd£¿n £¿etiner
%J tasar£¿m + kuram
%D 2011
%I Mimar Sinan G¨¹zel Sanatlar ?niversitesi Mimarl?k Fak¨¹ltesi
%X Tarihin i eri al nmas , tarihten al nan bi imler ve simgeler repertuar  ile ge mi e  yk¨¹nme tan d k oldu umuz bir mimar  yakla  m  sergiler. Bu  al  ma ilgi  ekilmek ad na yap lan t¨¹ketim toplumunun de erleri ile uzla may  kay ts z  arts z kabullenmi  bir post-modern anlay   n mimarl    hangi noktaya g t¨¹rd¨¹ ¨¹n¨¹ Amerika'da, Avrupa'da veya Uzak Do u'da de il Anadolu'nun ba r nda yap lan bir  rnekle irdelemeyi ama lamaktad r. Ele al nan fizik   evrede her  ey olur slogan  ile tam bir serbestli e ve eklektisizme varan mimar  tarz kolaj ve kitsche d n¨¹ m¨¹ t¨¹r. Bu fizik   evrenin fark  ve  nemi eklektik bir anlay    do al olan  taklit etmesiyle ortaya koymas ndad r. Do al olan n taklit edilmesi ile yere ait olan n i i bo alt lm   ve kamusal mekan yaln zca nesneleri bar nd ran konuma indirgenmi tir.  lgi  ekilmek ad na yap lan bu d¨¹zenleme g¨¹ndelik ya ant n n bir par as  haline gelince bir  e it duyars zl  a d n¨¹ m¨¹  ve bu duyars zl k, t¨¹ketim ad na me ru k l nm  t r. Do an n taklidi duyars zl   n yan s ra haf zas zl    beraberinde getirmektedir ve dolay s yla bu ikisi yabanc la maya neden olmaktad r. Do an n temsili y¨¹zeysel ve zahmetsiz t¨¹ketilir olmas  bak m ndan iyi bir malzemedir. Ancak, mekan  t¨¹ketim nesnesi olarak farkl l klar n ambalajland    ve sunuldu u bir konuma getirmekle kaybeden tek taraf mimarl kt r. Taking history into consideration, the inclina-tion to imitate historic forms and symbols are signs of a familiar architectural approach. The aim of this study is to show with the help of an example the level a post-modern understanding that unconditionally accepts to compromise the values of consumer society -not in America, in Europe or the Fareast- but in the very core of Anatolia, namely in Konya can bring architecture. This architectural style which reaches to eclectisism in a physical environment where everything is permitted, turns into collage and even further to kitsch. The difference and importance of this physical environment is in its bringing forth an eclectic understanding as the copy of a natural setting. This arrangement made for the sake of arousing interest turns into a sort of insensibility when it becomes part of everyday life and thus this insensibility is legitimized for the sake of consumption. This causes not only insensibility but also loss of memory and this leads to alienation. The replication of nature is a good means because it is consumed easily. However, the only side to lose will be architecture as it turns space into a position in which the differences are packed and presented as consumption objects.
%K Post-Modernizm
%K Sim¨¹lasyon
%K Taklit  evreler
%U http://tasarimkuram.msgsu.edu.tr/index.php/tasarimkuram/article/view/132