%0 Journal Article
%T Optimal specimen collection and transport methods for the detection of avian influenza virus and Newcastle disease virus
%A Erica Spackman
%A Janice C Pedersen
%A Enid T McKinley
%A Jack Gelb
%J BMC Veterinary Research
%D 2013
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1746-6148-9-35
%X Using real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR), virus isolation (VI) and commercial antigen detection immunoassays for AIV we observed statistically significant differences and consistent trends with some elements of sample collection and transport; media, dry transport and swab construction. Conversely, the number of swabs pooled (1, 5 or 11) and whether the swab was removed prior to transport did not impact virus detection. Similarly, with NDV detection by both VI and rRT-PCR was not affected by the numbers of swabs collected in a single vial (1, 5 or 11).We observed that flocked and foam swabs were superior to non-flocked swabs, BHI media was better than PBS, and transporting swabs wet was better for virus recovery and detection than transporting them dry. There was no observable difference in detection whether the swab was removed prior to transport or left in the vial. Also, with both AIV and NDV, there was no observed difference in virus detection between pools of 1, 5 or 11 swabs.
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/9/35/abstract