%0 Journal Article
%T Modulation of extracellular matrix genes reflects the magnitude of physiological adaptation to aerobic exercise training in humans
%A James A Timmons
%A Eva Jansson
%A Helene Fischer
%A Thomas Gustafsson
%A Paul L Greenhaff
%A John Ridden
%A Jonathan Rachman
%A Carl Sundberg
%J BMC Biology
%D 2005
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1741-7007-3-19
%X neuropilin-1 (800%; p < 0.001) and VEGF receptor 2 (300%; p < 0.01) transcript abundance increased only in the HRG, whereas levels of VEGF receptor 1 mRNA actually declined in the LRG (p < 0.05). TIE1 and TIE2 mRNA levels were unaltered in the LRG, whereas transcription levels of both genes were increased by 2.5-fold in the HRG (p < 0.01). Levels of thrombospondin-4 (900%; p < 0.001) and ¦Á2-macroglobulin (300%, p < 0.05) mRNA increased substantially in the HRG. In contrast, the amount of transforming growth factor ¦Â2 transcript increased only in the HRG (330%; p < 0.01), whereas it remained unchanged in the LRG (-80%).We demonstrate for the first time that aerobic training activates angiopoietin 1 and TIE2 genes in human muscle, but only when aerobic capacity adapts to exercise-training. The fourfold-greater increase in aerobic fitness and markedly differing gene expression profile in the HRG indicates that these ECM genes may be critical for physiological adaptation to exercise in humans. In addition, we show that, without careful demonstration of physiological adaptation, conclusions derived from gene expression profiling of human skeletal muscle following exercise may be of limited value. We propose that future studies should (a) investigate the mechanisms that underlie the apparent link between physiological adaptation and gene expression and (b) use the genes profiled in this paper as candidates for population genetic studies.Regular exercise and high aerobic fitness both reduce the risk of cardiovascular- and metabolic-disease-related death for a multitude of potential reasons [1-5]. It is noteworthy that a very large intersubject variation exists when measuring the physiological adaptation to supervised exercise training [6-9]. While some subjects demonstrate a robust increase in aerobic capacity, others seem not to respond substantially at all [8,10,11]. This variation also applies to the improvement in insulin sensitivity seen after exercise [9]. Such obser
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/3/19