%0 Journal Article
%T Residue contact-count potentials are as effective as residue-residue contact-type potentials for ranking protein decoys
%A Dan M Bolser
%A Ioannis Filippis
%A Henning Stehr
%A Jose Duarte
%A Michael Lappe
%J BMC Structural Biology
%D 2008
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1472-6807-8-53
%X A data set of nearly three thousand monomers was used to compare pairwise residue-residue 'contact-type' propensities to single-body residue 'contact-count' propensities. Using a large and standard set of protein decoys we performed an in-depth comparison of these two types of residue interaction propensities. The scores derived from the contact-type and contact-count propensities were assessed using two different performance metrics and were compared using 90 different definitions of residue-residue contact. Our findings show that both types of score perform equally well on the task of discriminating between near-native protein decoys. However, in a statistical sense, the contact-count based scores were found to carry more information than the contact-type based scores.Our analysis has shown that the performance of either type of score is very similar on a range of different decoys. This similarity suggests a common underlying biophysical principle for both types of residue interaction propensity. However, several features of the contact-count based propensity suggests that it should be used in preference to the contact-type based propensity. Specifically, it has been shown that contact-counts can be predicted from sequence information alone. In addition, the use of a single-body term allows for efficient alignment strategies using dynamic programming, which is useful for fold recognition, for example. These facts, combined with the relative simplicity of the contact-count propensity, suggests that contact-counts should be studied in more detail in the future.Accurate descriptions of the different non-covalent interactions involved in protein folding and stability are essential for a number of related problems. Potential energy functions based on such terms have been widely used to facilitate: fold recognition [1-3], homology modelling [4,5], docking [6], ab-initio structure prediction [7-9], sequence design [10] and the analysis of protein folding kinetics [11,12]
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6807/8/53