%0 Journal Article
%T §¡§á§â§Ú§à§â§ß§à§ã§ä§î §Ú §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§ç§ä§à§ß§ß§í§Ö §Ú§Õ§Ö§Ú §Ü§å§Ý§î§ä§å§â§í
%A Konew W. A.
%J Kantovskij Sbornik
%D 2009
%I Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
%R 10.5922/0207-6918-2009-2-10
%X The paper notes that the deduction of the a prioricognitive forms conducted by I. Kant was continuedby E. Cassirer and §®. Heidegger, whoshowed that the basis of a priori lies in certain waysof being of the man. Developing this approach to theinterpretation of the basis a priori, the author of the paper shows that culture as a way of existence of meaningful being gives a rise to the initial (autochthonic) ideas which become its categorical languageand arrange the space of a sense in culture. To such autochthonic ideas the author adds the idea of the sacral (dismemberment of space of sense) and also the idea of soul (comprehension of a temporal constancy).
%K a priori
%K category
%K autochthonic ideas
%K sacral
%K profane
%K soul
%K time
%K space
%K culture
%K significant being.
%U http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/541/ywfksgvsqq%20zw.%20sk.%20101-111.pdf