%0 Journal Article
%T Second Reply to Bergh
%A PETER H. LINDERT
%J Econ Journal Watch
%D 2006
%I Institute of Spontaneous Order Economics
%X I AM PLEASED THAT IN HIS SECOND COMMENT ANDREAS BERGH (2006b) has decided to ˇ°try even harder to recur to the facts,ˇ± and agrees that on the key econometric front our ˇ°actual disagreement is very smallˇ±. He also now reveals that he is ˇ°in fact rather friendly to the welfare state.ˇ± We seem to have achieved some convergence. Still, he retains some lingering disagreements with my analysis, and two main disagreements deserve to be noted briefly.
%U http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/Lindert2ndReplySeptember2006.pdf