%0 Journal Article
%T Les types d¡¯arguments dans le traitement du d¨¦bat sur la crise des banlieues par la t¨¦l¨¦vision Types of Arguments Used on TV in the French Suburban Crisis Debate
%A Anne Kalinic
%J Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
%D 2008
%I University of Tel-Aviv
%X Les ¨¦meutes de novembre 2005 survenues dans les banlieues fran aises ont suscit¨¦ un d¨¦bat m¨¦diatis¨¦ ¨¤ propos des causes de la crise et des modes d¡¯intervention pour sa r¨¦solution. A travers son traitement discursif, le journal t¨¦l¨¦vis¨¦ configure un cadrage du d¨¦bat dans lequel les prises de position des diff¨¦rents acteurs interview¨¦s viennent s¡¯opposer. L¡¯analyse des arguments des discours cit¨¦s se d¨¦composera sur les trois niveaux propos¨¦s par P. Charaudeau : probl¨¦matisation, positionnement et probation, en tenant compte de leur valeur - par exemple, ¨¦thique, pragmatique ou ¨¦motionnelle - afin de d¨¦gager les diff¨¦rentes strat¨¦gies ¨¤ vis¨¦e persuasive. The October and November 2005 riots of the French suburbs, following the death of two teenagers chased by the police, have kindled a debate in the media on the causes of the crisis and the means used to resolve it. By its treatment of the question, TV discourse frames this debate, in which the stands of the various interviewed actors are in conflict. The analysis of the quoted arguments is performed on the three levels described by P. Charaudeau: ¡°problematizing¡±, positioning, proving, while considering their value¡ªfor example, ethical, pragmatical or emotional¡ªin order to find out the different strategies meant at persuading.
%K argumentation
%K suburbs
%K television news
%K polyphonic argumentation
%K positioning
%K persuasion
%K banlieues
%K journal t¨¦l¨¦vis¨¦
%K argumentation
%K argumentation polyphonique
%K positionnement
%K vis¨¦e persuasive
%U http://aad.revues.org/198