%0 Journal Article
%T ¨¦rtelem, helyettes¨ªthet s¨¦g, c¨ªmk¨¦zetts¨¦g ¨C Graeme Forbes a nevek jelent¨¦s¨¦r l
%A Csat¨¢ri
%A Ferenc
%J Argumentum
%D 2012
%I Debrecen University Press
%X Below I analyze some of the arguments of the representatives of direct reference theory and of the opponent neo-freagean approach. According to the direct reference theorist, the content of a (proper) name is nothing more than its referent itself, while the neo-fregean insists that this content is a mode of presentation of the referent. In short, the latter is trying to get rid of the awkward, counter-intuitive consequences of the direct reference theory by attaching some kind of sense to the proper names. It is to be seen though, that these conceptions are far not unproblematic.
%K philosophy of language
%K meaning
%K sense
%K direct reference
%U http://argumentum.unideb.hu/2012-anyagok/CsatariF.pdf