%0 Journal Article
%T Oral contraceptives modify DNA methylation and monocyte-derived macrophage function
%A Ilaria Campesi
%A Manuela Sanna
%A Angelo Zinellu
%A Ciriaco Carru
%A Laura Rubattu
%A Pamela Bulzomi
%A Giuseppe Seghieri
%A Giancarlo Tonolo
%A Mario Palermo
%A Giuseppe Rosano
%A Maria Marino
%A Flavia Franconi
%J Biology of Sex Differences
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2042-6410-3-4
%X Healthy adult women were enrolled and stratified into two groups: women who did not use OCs (Fs) and women treated with OCs (FOCs). FOCs were further stratified as a function of androgenic (FOCA+) and non-androgenic (FOCA-) properties of progestins. Routine hematological, biochemical, inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction parameters were measured. Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) were evaluated for the expression and activity of estrogen receptors and androgen receptors, and release of tumor necrosis factor ¦Á (TNF¦Á) was measured from unstimulated and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells.As is already known, the use of OCs changed numerous parameters: the number of lymphocytes, iron levels, total iron-binding capacity of transferrin, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and C-reactive protein increased, while prothrombin time and alkaline phosphatase decreased. Hormonal levels also varied: cortisol was higher in FOCs, while luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone were lower in FOCs. Asymmetric dimethylarginine, an index of endothelial function, was lower in FOC than in Fs, as were cysteine and bilirubin. The androgenic properties of progestins affected the activity of OCs: in particular, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein and calcium were higher in FOCA- than in FOCA+, whereas percentage oxygen saturation and ¦Ã-glutamyl transpeptidase were lower in FOCA- than in FOCA+. Importantly, FOCs had a lower global DNA methylation, indicating that OC may have epigenetic effects on gene expression. OC did not modify the expression of androgen receptor but increased estrogen receptor ¦Á expression, more considerably in FOCA+, and decreased estrogen receptor ¦Â, more considerably in FOCA-. Importantly, the activation state of estrogen receptor ¦Â in FOCs was decreased, while estrogen receptor ¦Á was not active in either Fs or FOCs. Unstimulated MDMs obtained from FOCs showed higher release of TNF¦Á in co
%K androgenic and non-androgenic progestin
%K combined oral contraceptive
%K estrogen receptors
%K global DNA methylation
%K monocyte-derived macrophages
%K TNF¦Á
%U http://www.bsd-journal.com/content/3/1/4