%0 Journal Article
%T Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China
%A Bing-shun Wang
%A Li-feng Zhou
%A David Coulter
%A Hong Liang
%A Ye Zhong
%A Yu-na Guo
%A Li-ping Zhu
%A Xiao-ling Gao
%A Wei Yuan
%A Er-sheng Gao
%J BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
%D 2010
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2393-10-78
%X An indication-matched cohort study was undertaken to compare maternal outcomes following caesarean section with those undergoing vaginal delivery, in which the two groups were matched for non-absolute indications. 301 nulliparous women with caesarean section were matched successfully with 301 women who delivered vaginally in the Maternal and Children's Hospitals (MCHs) in Shanghai, China. Logistic regression model or binomial regression model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) directly. Adjusted RRs were calculated adjusting for propensity score and medical indications.The incidence of total complications was 2.2 times higher in the caesarean section group during hospitalization post-partum, compared with the vaginal delivery group (RR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4). The risk of haemorrhage from the start of labour until 2 hours post-partum was significantly higher in the caesarean group (RR = 5.6; 95% CI: 1.2-26.9). The risk of chronic abdominal pain was significantly higher for the caesarean section group (RR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.2-10.9) than for the vaginal delivery group within 12 months post-partum. The two groups had similar incidences of anaemia and complicating infections such as wound complications or urinary tract infection.In nulliparous women who were at low risk, caesarean section was associated with a higher rate of post-partum morbidity. Those requesting the surgical procedure with no conventional medical indication, should be advised of the potential risks.Rates of caesarean section are progressively increasing in many parts of the world, particularly among developing countries such as China [1-4]. In many Chinese hospitals, the caesarean section rate was more than 40%, while in some cases, it was up to 80% [2-4], which was much higher than the acceptable caesarean rate (5-15%) in WHO's guidelines [5]. Although the rate of caesarean section resulting in the best outcome for mothers and children continues to be a matter of debate, it is evident that a b
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/78