%0 Journal Article
%T Correction: Does artificial nutrition improve outcome of critical illness
%A Miet Schetz
%A Michael Casaer
%A Greet Van den Berghe
%J Critical Care
%D 2013
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/cc12509
%X On page 4 under the subheading "Recent randomized controlled trials", the text currently reads "However, both ICU and hospital stays were shorter in the tight-calorie group, clearly introducing the statistical problem of informative censoring/competing risk that we discussed earlier." The ICU and hospital stays are in fact longer in the tight-calorie group, and this statement should therefore read "However, both ICU and hospital stays were longer in the tight-calorie group, clearly introducing the statistical problem of informative censoring/competing risk that we discussed earlier."On page 5 also under the subheading "Recent randomized controlled trials", the text currently reads "The EN amount did not differ between groups and reached ¡À50% of target at day 7." In fact, the EN amount reached ¡À20% of target at day 7, and this statement should therefore read "The EN amount did not differ between groups and reached ¡À20% of target at day 7."The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
%U http://ccforum.com/content/17/1/413